Table of contents:
In a world increasingly defined by accuracy and efficiency, Chirp technology has quietly become one of the most transformative innovations in modern sensing and communication. Derived from the concept of a “chirp” — a signal whose frequency increases or decreases over time — this technology operates on a deceptively simple principle inspired by the natural world. Just as bats and dolphins use varying sound frequencies to locate objects and navigate their surroundings, chirp-based systems transmit short bursts of frequency-modulated signals that can be analysed to determine distance, speed, and position with remarkable precision.
At its core, Chirp technology relies on the transmission and reception of acoustic signals, typically ultrasonic waves, to measure the time it takes for a signal to travel from sender to receiver. Because the signal’s frequency changes during transmission, the system can distinguish between reflections and noise far more effectively than conventional methods. The result is an ability to detect and measure movement, proximity, or position even in complex or noisy environments where traditional radio or optical systems struggle. This combination of robustness and simplicity has made chirp-based systems a quiet powerhouse behind many modern innovations.
In consumer applications, Chirp technology has already found its way into everyday life, often without users realising it. Smartphones and wearables, for instance, use chirp-based ultrasonic communication to enable device pairing, secure payments, or proximity detection without relying solely on Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. In vehicles, chirp sensors enhance parking assistance and collision avoidance systems by offering precise short-range distance measurement, unaffected by visual obstructions or lighting conditions. Industrial automation, too, benefits from chirp-based sensing — machines and robots equipped with ultrasonic chirp modules can navigate factory floors, detect obstacles, and synchronise movements in dynamic environments.
Perhaps the most compelling aspect of Chirp technology lies in its versatility. It functions reliably in air, water, and even certain solid materials, making it an attractive solution across diverse domains. In underwater environments, where radio signals fade quickly, chirp-based sonar enables everything from fish finders to autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) navigation. In medical settings, chirp waveforms form the basis of advanced ultrasound imaging, providing clearer, higher-resolution visuals of soft tissue and blood flow. Even agriculture has begun adopting chirp-based sensors to monitor soil moisture and crop health, translating acoustic data into actionable insights that help optimise resource use.
What distinguishes Chirp technology from other sensing methods is its ability to deliver high accuracy with minimal power consumption and bandwidth requirements. Its acoustic nature allows for low-energy operation, while the frequency sweep of each chirp ensures signal clarity even in cluttered or reflective environments. This balance between efficiency and precision has led engineers and researchers to view chirp not as a niche tool but as a fundamental building block for next-generation sensing systems.
As the digital and physical worlds converge, the ability to understand and interact with environments in real time has never been more critical. Chirp technology, with its elegant blend of physics and engineering, is emerging as one of the key enablers of this shift — an invisible yet indispensable sound shaping the connected world.
Strip away the jargon and you’ll find a surprisingly broad industrial map behind Chirp technology. On the water, the biggest brand names in marine electronics—Garmin, Lowrance (part of Brunswick’s Navico Group), Raymarine (Teledyne FLIR) and Furuno—have spent the past decade turning chirped, frequency-modulated pulses into high-definition fish finders and sounders. Lowrance markets CHIRP across its transducer and HDS platforms; Raymarine sells dedicated CHIRP sonar modules like the CP470 and CP570; and Furuno pushes “TruEcho CHIRP” through a full fish-finder lineup. Beneath many of these systems sits Airmar, the New Hampshire-based supplier that popularised “chirp-ready” transducers for multiple brands. (1)
Consumer electronics and industrial sensing are another pillar. TDK’s acquisition of Berkeley-spinout Chirp Microsystems cemented a push into MEMS ultrasonic sensors—tiny, low-power devices now used for rangefinding, gesture control, and proximity features in compact products. Murata, meanwhile, remains a high-volume supplier of ultrasonic transducers found across factory automation and device makers. In other words, a good chunk of the “who” behind Chirp technology is component houses that enable OEMs to package chirped acoustics into finished goods. (2)
Sizing the markets requires looking at several overlapping pools. The global ultrasonic-sensor category—where chirped ultrasonic methods are a core technique—is forecast in multiple analyses to be a mid-single-digit-to-low-teens billion-dollar space by the early 2030s. Recent estimates peg the market at roughly $6–7 billion in 2025, rising toward $11–16 billion by 2030–2032, depending on methodology and segment mix. The growth thesis is consistent across firms: non-contact measurement for automation, automotive features, and consumer devices. (3)
Marine is smaller but visible. Fish-finder and sonar hardware—where Chirp technology has become table stakes—lands in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually, with recent reports estimating roughly $0.6–0.9 billion this decade as recreational electronics upgrade cycles continue. The brands named above dominate the premium tiers, while Airmar’s transducers underpin broad swaths of the installed base. (4)
Then there’s automotive radar, which doesn’t use acoustics but does rely on linear frequency “chirps” (FMCW) for ranging and velocity—another expression of Chirp technology in the wild. This market is scaling faster than marine, pulled by ADAS mandates and 77-GHz platforms from chipmakers and Tier-1s; recent forecasts cluster around high-single- to double-digit billions mid-decade, with trajectories into the tens of billions by early 2030s. Technical primers from Texas Instruments detail how chirped waveforms sit at the heart of modern mmWave radar. (5)
Put together, the “chirp economy” is less a single industry than a stack: component suppliers (transducers, MEMS, mmWave chipsets), branded systems (sounders, modules, sensors), and domain-specific integrators in marine, industrial automation, consumer devices, and vehicles. The common thread is the same physics—swept-frequency signals that buy you resolution and noise rejection—commercialised by a handful of recognisable brands and many behind-the-scenes suppliers, and expanding steadily as measurement and perception become default features of modern products.
At its simplest, real-time location systems (RTLS) need two things: a way to measure distance or angle, and enough reference points (anchors) to turn those measurements into x-y positions. Chirp technology—ultrasonic signals whose frequency sweeps over time—does the former by timing how long a coded acoustic pulse takes to travel between a tag and anchors. Because the chirped waveform is easy to detect and correlate even in noisy spaces, the system can deliver stable ranging without leaning on crowded radio bands. In practice, ceiling-mounted ultrasonic anchors emit or listen for chirps; a tag replies or initiates a burst; time-of-flight and multilateration produce a position in real time. The approach benefits from excellent multipath discrimination and immunity to RF interference, which is why several sensor makers (e.g., TDK/Chirp Microsystems) have leaned into compact, low-power MEMS ultrasonic transceivers suitable for tags or anchors. (6)
Accuracy in Chirp technology RTLS typically depends on anchor density, geometry and environmental factors like temperature (which slightly changes the speed of sound). In controlled industrial or healthcare spaces where anchors “see” a zone directly, published comparisons show ultrasonic RTLS can reach sub-meter accuracy and deliver smooth tracks for assets and people. A head-to-head evaluation of ultrasound versus ultra-wideband (UWB) in an industrial lab found both viable, with ultrasound competitive on accuracy in static tests and robust in dynamic ones when anchors are well-placed. (7)
Alternatives span multiple radios. UWB tags and anchors exchange short, wideband RF pulses and compute distances via two-way time-of-flight; commercial modules (e.g., Qorvo/Decawave DW1000 and DWM1001) routinely demonstrate decimeter-level accuracy at high update rates, which makes UWB a benchmark for precision RTLS—albeit with higher bill-of-materials and energy costs than many ultrasound builds.
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) can do RTLS in two principal ways: RSSI fingerprinting (coarser, meter-scale) and Bluetooth 5.1+ direction finding (Angle of Arrival/AoA), which uses antenna arrays to estimate bearings to tags and triangulate positions. AoA systems from vendors like Quuppa have shown sub-meter results in favourable layouts, with the advantage of low-cost tags and a mature BLE ecosystem; accuracy and calibration, however, are sensitive to RF reflections and antenna design.
Wi-Fi RTLS began with RSSI heatmaps but has advanced with IEEE 802.11mc/FTM “Round-Trip Time” (RTT), which adds true distance measurements to access points. With three or more RTT-capable APs, phones and tags can hit one-to-two-meter accuracy in tuned deployments, leveraging existing infrastructure—though AP support and network control vary by site. (8)
Against this backdrop, Chirp technology shines where RF congestion, regulatory constraints, or electromagnetic compatibility make radio-based RTLS awkward. Ultrasound doesn’t interfere with Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, is intrinsically contained by walls (useful for room-level zoning), and can run at very low transmit power, extending tag battery life. Its chirped waveforms also help separate direct paths from echoes, improving ranging stability in reflective interiors. Trade-offs include line-of-sight sensitivity—soft barriers like people can attenuate sound—and the need to compensate for temperature and airflow to maintain tight accuracy. Careful anchor placement and environmental calibration address most of these factors, and modern MEMS ultrasonic sensors simplify integration on both the anchor and tag side. For many facilities seeking dependable sub-meter tracking without RF headaches, Chirp technology RTLS offers a pragmatic balance of precision, power and predictable containment (read further about the concept of an RTLS asset tracking system).
Chirp technology is based on sending and receiving frequency-modulated signals—called “chirps”—that change pitch over time. By measuring how long it takes a chirp to travel to and from a target, systems can calculate distance, speed, or position with high accuracy. This principle is used in sonar, radar, and ultrasonic sensors across multiple industries.
It’s found in a wide range of applications, including fish finders, automotive radar, smartphones, drones, and industrial automation. In recent years, Chirp technology has become an essential part of real-time location systems (RTLS), enabling precise indoor tracking of assets, tools, and personnel.
Unlike radio-based systems such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, chirp signals are acoustic and therefore immune to electromagnetic interference. They provide reliable accuracy even in metallic or crowded environments, use very little power, and can be easily confined to specific areas—making Chirp technology particularly well-suited for manufacturing and other industrial settings.
In manufacturing, Chirp technology brings clarity and control to real-time location systems by providing precise, interference-free tracking of tools, assets, and personnel. Its ultrasonic foundation delivers stable accuracy even in metallic or radio-noisy environments where RF-based RTLS often falters. Because chirp signals are low-power and naturally confined to specific zones, they enable safe, energy-efficient localisation without cross-plant interference. The result is a dependable positioning layer that strengthens workflow automation, enhances safety compliance, and supports lean operations—making Chirp technology a compelling enabler of smarter, more transparent manufacturing processes.
Delve deeper into one of our core topics: Real time locating system
In chirp-based sensing, “noise” is any unwanted acoustic/electrical fluctuation that masks the returned chirp. Chirp systems combat it with matched filtering (pulse compression): the signal collapses to a narrow peak while random noise remains spread, yielding a signal-to-noise improvement roughly proportional to the time-bandwidth product. Practical limits arise from range sidelobes, multipath, and nonideal hardware; windowing can suppress sidelobes at a small SNR cost. For rigorous treatment, see Skolnik’s Radar Handbook and TI’s mmWave chirp guide. (9)
References:
(1) https://www.lowrance.com/sonar-basics/
(3) https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/ultrasonic-sensors-market
(4) https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fish-finders-market-forecast-exceed-094500999.html
(5) https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/automotive-radar-market
(7) https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/479147399/ssrn-4470408.pdf
(8) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11mc
Note: This article was partly created with the assistance of artificial intelligence to support drafting. The head image was generated by AI.