Mustering is the structured process of accounting for all personnel during an emergency on an offshore installation, such as an oil and gas platform, offshore wind substation, or floating production unit. Its primary purpose is to confirm who is safe, who is missing, and who may require assistance, so that emergency response actions can be executed effectively. Offshore environments are isolated, complex, and potentially hazardous, which makes rapid accountability essential. Mustering exists to reduce chaos during emergencies, support decision-making under pressure, and protect lives by ensuring that evacuation, rescue, and firefighting efforts are based on reliable personnel status information. It also provides the incident commander with a common operational picture, enabling coordination between onboard teams and onshore emergency management.
https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/SOLAS.aspx
Mustering is a core element of offshore emergency management and is tightly integrated with alarm systems, emergency response plans, evacuation procedures, and command structures. When an incident occurs, mustering provides the personnel accountability data that informs every subsequent response decision. Without knowing who is present, safe, or missing, emergency teams cannot prioritize search and rescue, assess escalation risks, or decide when evacuation is complete. In this sense, mustering acts as the informational backbone of emergency management. It transforms alarms and procedures into actionable responses by linking people to locations and status. Offshore emergency management frameworks treat mustering not as a standalone activity, but as a continuous process that begins before an incident through preparation, drills, and role assignments, and continues until the emergency is formally closed.
https://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/emergencies.htm
Offshore installations operate in remote locations where external emergency services cannot arrive quickly, and evacuation options are limited by weather, sea state, and transport availability. Unlike onshore facilities, offshore platforms often house hundreds of people in confined spaces, with complex escape routes and multiple hazard zones. In this context, not knowing the whereabouts of even a single person can delay evacuation, endanger rescue teams, and escalate overall risk. Personnel accountability is therefore critical to prevent unnecessary exposure to hazards and to ensure that emergency resources are used efficiently. Mustering compensates for the lack of immediate external support by enabling the installation to function as a self-contained emergency response system, where informed decisions must be made rapidly and autonomously.
https://www.energyinst.org/expertise/offshore-safety
Mustering may be triggered by a wide range of emergency scenarios offshore, including fire, explosion, gas release, loss of stability, collision, helicopter incidents, and extreme weather events. It can also be initiated during security threats or medical emergencies that require partial or full evacuation. Importantly, mustering is not limited to catastrophic events; it may also be used during precautionary situations where the potential for escalation exists. The trigger is usually an alarm or command from the offshore installation manager, based on predefined emergency response criteria. By standardizing when mustering occurs, offshore operators ensure that personnel accountability is achieved early, before confusion or panic undermines response effectiveness.
https://www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/510.pdf
Muster stations are designated safe areas where personnel assemble during an emergency to be accounted for and receive instructions. Their role is both practical and psychological. Practically, they provide known locations where headcounts can be performed and evacuation equipment accessed. Psychologically, they reduce uncertainty by giving personnel a clear, rehearsed destination during stressful situations. Muster stations are carefully designed to be protected from primary hazards, accessible from accommodation and work areas, and capable of supporting large numbers of people. Their placement and capacity are integral to offshore safety case approvals and are evaluated through risk assessments and evacuation modeling. Effective mustering relies on muster stations being clearly marked, familiar, and trusted by personnel.
https://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/safety-cases.htm
Human factors play a decisive role in mustering effectiveness because emergencies place individuals under stress, time pressure, and cognitive overload. Confusion, fear, and misinterpretation of alarms can lead to delayed or incorrect responses, such as going to the wrong muster station or attempting to retrieve personal belongings. Mustering processes are therefore designed to be simple, repetitive, and reinforced through training and drills. Clear signage, unambiguous alarms, and strong leadership at muster stations help counteract human limitations. Understanding human behavior under stress allows operators to design mustering procedures that are resilient, realistic, and more likely to succeed when conditions are far from ideal.
https://www.hse.gov.uk/humanfactors/topics/emergency.htm
Standardization and documentation of mustering procedures ensure consistency, predictability, and regulatory compliance across offshore operations. Personnel often rotate between installations, contractors, and projects, so standardized processes reduce the learning curve and minimize the risk of error during emergencies. Documented procedures also form the basis for training, drills, audits, and incident investigations. Regulators require clear evidence that mustering arrangements are understood, practiced, and fit for purpose. By documenting mustering processes, operators can demonstrate due diligence and continuously improve based on lessons learned. Standardization does not eliminate flexibility, but it provides a common framework that supports coordinated action under extreme conditions.
https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Documents/ISPS%20Code.pdf
Mustering provides decision-makers with real-time or near-real-time information about personnel status, which is essential for prioritizing response actions. Knowing who is safe, who is missing, and where people were last known to be located allows emergency commanders to assess risk, allocate rescue teams, and decide whether conditions permit escalation or evacuation. Without accurate mustering data, decisions are based on assumptions, which can lead to unnecessary exposure or delays. Mustering turns uncertainty into structured information, enabling leadership to act decisively. In offshore emergencies, where time and resources are limited, this clarity can mean the difference between a controlled response and a compounding disaster.
https://www.energyinst.org/media/5475/emergency-response.pdf
Mustering and evacuation are inseparable processes, with mustering serving as the gateway to safe evacuation. Evacuation should proceed only after personnel accountability has been established, ensuring that no one is left behind or unaccounted for. Muster stations function as staging areas where readiness for evacuation is assessed, and instructions are communicated. In some scenarios, partial mustering may occur to support phased evacuation, while in others, full mustering precedes abandonment. The effectiveness of evacuation depends heavily on the quality of mustering, as inaccurate counts can result in delayed departures or dangerous re-entry into hazardous zones.
https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/Evacuation.aspx
Drills and training transform mustering from a theoretical procedure into a practiced behavior. Regular exercises help personnel internalize alarm signals, routes, and muster station locations, reducing hesitation during real emergencies. Training also allows organizations to identify weaknesses, such as bottlenecks, unclear responsibilities, or communication gaps. Offshore regulations typically mandate periodic mustering drills to maintain readiness and demonstrate compliance. Beyond compliance, drills build confidence and trust in the system, which is critical when real incidents occur. A well-drilled workforce is more likely to respond calmly and correctly, making mustering faster and more reliable under stress.
https://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/training.htm
Traditional mustering is based on assumptions such as fixed personnel numbers, predictable movement patterns, and the availability of key individuals to conduct headcounts. It assumes that people will follow procedures, reach their assigned muster stations, and that communication channels remain functional. These assumptions are generally valid under controlled conditions but can be challenged during complex or escalating incidents. Understanding these assumptions is essential for evaluating the robustness of mustering processes and identifying where additional safeguards may be needed. The evolution of mustering concepts has largely been driven by recognizing and mitigating the limitations of these traditional assumptions.
https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr1041.pdf
Mustering is a mandatory element of offshore safety regulations and safety case regimes in most jurisdictions. Regulators expect operators to demonstrate that they can account for all personnel during emergencies and that their systems are reliable and tested. Mustering procedures, drill records, and incident reports are part of regulatory inspections and audits. Effective mustering shows that an operator has control over its workforce and emergency risks. Failure in mustering can lead to enforcement actions, reputational damage, and legal consequences. As such, mustering is not only a safety function but also a compliance obligation embedded in offshore governance.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/offshore-safety-directive
Leadership is critical during mustering because people look for authority and reassurance in emergencies. Muster station leaders and offshore installation managers are responsible for maintaining order, communicating clearly, and making timely decisions based on available information. Effective leadership helps prevent panic, ensures procedures are followed, and supports accurate accountability. Leaders must be trained not only in technical procedures but also in communication and human behavior under stress. Their ability to remain calm and decisive directly influences how smoothly mustering unfolds and how confident personnel feel in the overall emergency response.
https://www.energyinst.org/training/emergency-response
The concept of mustering has evolved from simple manual headcounts to a more integrated part of holistic safety management systems. Historically, mustering relied heavily on paper lists and verbal confirmation, reflecting smaller crews and simpler installations. As offshore operations grew in scale and complexity, the limitations of purely manual approaches became apparent. This led to improved procedures, clearer roles, and eventually the introduction of electronic support systems. Conceptually, mustering has shifted from being a reactive task to a proactive safety function, embedded in design, training, and continuous risk management.
https://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/history.htm
Mustering is often described as a last line of defense because it comes into play when preventive and mitigative measures have failed or are at risk of failing. While engineering controls and operational procedures aim to prevent incidents, mustering focuses on protecting people when an emergency is already unfolding. Its effectiveness does not stop an incident, but it limits its human consequences. By ensuring that everyone is accounted for and guided toward safety, mustering reduces the likelihood of fatalities and severe injuries. In offshore safety philosophy, this makes mustering a critical, people-centered safeguard.
Crew Companion for Safe Energy ensures real-time tracking, automated mustering, access control, and personnel visibility across offshore and onshore installations such as oil rigs and FPSOs. It replaces manual processes for emergency response and POB (Personnel On Board) management, cuts muster times by up to 70%, complies with safety regulations, and integrates with existing flight, vessel, and access systems.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
Electronic mustering is the use of digital technologies to automatically or semi-automatically account for personnel during normal operations and emergencies offshore. Instead of relying solely on manual headcounts and paper lists, electronic mustering systems collect presence and location data through devices such as RFID tags, smart cards, wearables, or mobile devices. These systems provide near-real-time visibility of who is on board, where they are, and whether they have reached a muster station. The goal is to improve speed, accuracy, and confidence in personnel accountability, especially under stressful emergency conditions. Electronic mustering does not eliminate procedures or human roles but augments them with reliable data, enabling better decision-making and reducing the risk of missing or miscounting individuals.
Reference: https://www.energyinst.org/expertise/digitalisation
Electronic mustering systems typically combine identification technology, location detection, communication infrastructure, and software platforms. Identification is commonly achieved through RFID, NFC, Bluetooth Low Energy, or active tracking tags assigned to each person. Location data is collected via fixed readers, beacons, or wireless networks installed across the offshore installation. This data is transmitted through wired or wireless communication systems to a central software application. The software aggregates, visualizes, and interprets the data, presenting personnel status at muster stations and control rooms. Redundancy and resilience are key design principles, as systems must function during power loss or network degradation. Together, these components form an integrated system that supports reliable electronic personnel accountability.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr1041.pdf
RFID-based mustering uses radio-frequency identification tags worn or carried by personnel and readers installed at strategic locations such as entry points, zones, and muster stations. When a person passes a reader, the tag is automatically detected and logged. In an emergency, the system determines who has arrived at a muster station by reading tags in that area. Active RFID tags can transmit signals over longer distances and provide periodic updates, while passive tags require proximity to readers. Offshore environments often favor active RFID due to the presence of metallic structures and complex layouts. RFID-based mustering reduces reliance on manual reporting and enables faster confirmation of personnel presence, even in low-visibility or high-noise conditions.
Reference: https://www.rfidjournal.com/industries/oil-gas
Real-time location systems, or RTLS, extend electronic mustering by continuously tracking personnel movement across an offshore installation. Using technologies such as UWB, BLE, or hybrid radio systems, RTLS provides more granular location data than simple checkpoint-based detection. During an emergency, RTLS can show not only who has reached a muster station but also where missing persons were last detected. This information is invaluable for directing search and rescue teams and assessing exposure to hazards. RTLS also supports proactive safety management by monitoring restricted areas and abnormal behavior. In mustering contexts, RTLS transforms accountability from a snapshot into a dynamic, continuously updated process.
Reference: https://www.iso.org/standard/62928.html
Electronic mustering systems are often integrated with access control systems that manage who is allowed on board and in specific areas. When personnel badge in or out of an installation, the access control system automatically updates the personnel-on-board list. This integration ensures that mustering data starts from an accurate baseline of who is present offshore. During emergencies, access control data complements real-time detection by confirming expected personnel numbers and identifying unauthorized or missing individuals. Integration reduces administrative effort and data inconsistencies while improving overall system reliability. From a safety perspective, this linkage ensures accountability throughout the lifecycle of offshore presence.
Reference: https://www.identecsolutions.com/news/electronic-mustering-on-drill-ships-fpso-how-to-run-mustering-drills
Electronic mustering software serves as the system's brain, transforming raw sensor data into actionable information. Essential functions include personnel databases, real-time dashboards, muster status visualization, alarm handling, and reporting. The software must clearly display who is accounted for, who is missing, and where people were last detected. Usability is critical, as operators may need to interpret information quickly under stress. Audit trails and reporting functions support post-incident analysis and regulatory compliance. Modern systems often include integration capabilities with alarm systems, public address systems, and emergency management platforms, ensuring that mustering is part of a unified operational picture.
Reference: https://www.identecsolutions.com/news/how-to-integrate-rfid-mustering-in-an-offshore-safety-concept
Offshore environments present challenges such as saltwater corrosion, vibration, electromagnetic interference, and extreme weather. Electronic mustering systems are designed with industrial-grade hardware, sealed enclosures, and redundant components to ensure reliability. Power backup, such as uninterruptible power supplies and battery-powered tags, is essential to maintain functionality during outages. Network redundancy and fail-safe modes ensure that partial system failures do not result in total loss of accountability. Extensive testing and certification are typically required before deployment. Reliability is not only a technical issue but also an operational one, supported by maintenance routines and regular system health checks.
Reference: https://www.dnv.com/services/offshore-digital-systems-assurance-173960
Point-based electronic mustering relies on detection at specific locations, such as muster station entrances or checkpoints, confirming that a person has physically passed a reader. Zone-based mustering, by contrast, determines whether a person is present within a defined area using continuous or periodic signals. Point-based systems are simpler and often used as direct replacements for manual headcounts. Zone-based systems provide broader situational awareness but may involve more complex infrastructure and data interpretation. Offshore operators choose between these approaches based on risk profile, installation layout, and operational needs. Both approaches can be combined to enhance accuracy and resilience.
Reference: https://www.energyinst.org/expertise/offshore-safety-technology
Wearable devices such as smart badges, helmets, or wristbands enable electronic mustering by embedding identification and communication capabilities directly on personnel. These devices can automatically transmit identity, location, and status information, reducing reliance on manual actions during emergencies. Some wearables include additional sensors, such as motion or panic buttons, which can indicate distress or immobility. In mustering scenarios, wearables increase detection reliability because they remain with the person at all times. Their design must balance robustness, battery life, comfort, and safety certification. Wearables represent a practical interface between human behavior and digital accountability systems offshore.
Reference: https://www.identecsolutions.com/news/mobile-mustering-offshore-and-onshore
Electronic mustering systems depend on data accuracy, which can be affected by signal interference, tag damage, or improper personnel use. Metallic structures and confined spaces offshore can cause signal reflections or blind spots. Battery depletion in active devices may lead to missed detections. Human factors, such as failure to wear assigned tags, also affect accuracy. To address these challenges, systems are designed with redundancy, validation logic, and alerts for abnormal conditions. Regular testing and user training are essential to maintain trust in the system. Recognizing and managing data limitations is crucial for effective use of electronic mustering in emergencies.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr941.pdf
During drills, electronic mustering systems provide objective data on response times, movement patterns, and muster completion. This allows operators to evaluate drill performance more accurately than manual observation alone. The system can identify delays, congestion points, or personnel who did not follow procedures. Post-drill reports support continuous improvement and targeted training. Using electronic mustering during drills also familiarizes personnel with the technology, increasing acceptance and confidence. Over time, this integration helps align real emergency performance with planned procedures, making drills a valuable feedback mechanism rather than a purely compliance-driven exercise.
Reference: https://www.energyinst.org/training/offshore-drills
Electronic mustering systems handle sensitive operational and personal data, making cybersecurity a critical concern. Unauthorized access, data manipulation, or system outages could undermine emergency response. Cybersecurity measures include network segmentation, encryption, access controls, and regular vulnerability assessments. Offshore systems must also balance security with availability, ensuring that protective measures do not impede emergency functionality. Compliance with industrial cybersecurity standards and alignment with broader operational technology security frameworks is increasingly expected. As mustering systems become more connected, cybersecurity becomes an integral part of safety assurance rather than a purely IT concern.
Reference: https://www.iec.ch/dyn/www/f?p=103:85:0::::FSP_LANG_ID:25
Electronic mustering systems are designed to be scalable across different asset types, from fixed platforms to floating vessels and offshore wind installations. Scalability depends on modular architecture, configurable software, and adaptable communication infrastructure. A well-designed system can accommodate changes in personnel numbers, layout modifications, and varying operational modes. Scalability is particularly important for operators managing fleets of assets, as it enables standardized processes while allowing site-specific customization. From a lifecycle perspective, scalable systems protect investment by supporting future expansion, regulatory changes, and integration with additional digital safety solutions.
Reference: https://www.dnv.com/oilgas/digital-solutions.html
Electronic mustering is intended to support, not replace, human judgment and manual procedures. In emergencies, technology provides speed and data, while people provide interpretation, leadership, and decision-making. Manual verification remains important as a fallback and to confirm electronic data. Regulations and best practices typically require that electronic systems be used alongside established procedures, not as a sole line of defense. This complementary approach increases resilience by combining technological efficiency with human adaptability. When properly integrated, electronic mustering enhances confidence in accountability without creating overreliance on automation.
Where harsh conditions exist and your next location is hours away, Crew Companion is the answer for the safety of your staff; a scalable and customisable personnel monitoring solution to meet your organisation’s safety needs in onshore and offshore operations. It provides automated personnel safety assistance, access control and workflow optimisation – all in line with the most stringent HSE and business requirements.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
Operational challenges during offshore mustering often stem from time pressure, incomplete information, and environmental constraints. Alarms may coincide with power loss, reduced visibility, smoke, or noise, making communication difficult. Personnel may be dispersed across work areas, some in transit or engaged in critical tasks, which complicates rapid assembly. Congestion in escape routes and at muster stations can delay accountability. In addition, changing crew compositions, contractors unfamiliar with the installation, and language barriers increase complexity. These challenges highlight that mustering is not merely a procedural task but a dynamic operation that must function under degraded conditions. Effective design, drills, and clear leadership are required to ensure that mustering remains reliable when normal operating assumptions no longer apply.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/emergencies.htm
Stress significantly influences how individuals perceive alarms and follow mustering procedures. Under pressure, people may freeze, panic, or revert to habitual behaviors rather than trained responses. Some may attempt to collect personal items or seek colleagues instead of proceeding directly to muster stations. Cognitive overload can also impair communication and situational awareness. These human factors can delay mustering and lead to inaccurate accountability. Offshore safety management, therefore, emphasizes realistic training, simple procedures, and strong on-scene leadership to counter stress. Recognizing that human behavior is predictable under stress allows organizations to design mustering processes that are more tolerant of error and better aligned with real-world responses.
Reference: https://www.identecsolutions.com/news/emergency-mustering-how-to-use-transponders-to-their-full-potential
Physical hazards such as fire, smoke, gas releases, structural damage, and flooding can obstruct access routes and render muster stations unsafe or inaccessible. Secondary hazards, including falling objects or loss of lighting, further complicate movement. Weather conditions such as heavy seas or extreme cold can also affect external muster points or evacuation readiness. These hazards may evolve rapidly, making a planned muster route or location unusable. As a result, offshore mustering systems must be flexible and supported by contingency planning. Understanding how hazards interact with human movement is essential for designing resilient mustering arrangements that remain effective in deteriorating conditions.
Reference: https://www.energyinst.org/expertise/offshore-safety
Headcount inaccuracies arise from reliance on manual reporting, assumptions about personnel location, and dynamic changes during emergencies. People may be injured, trapped, or assisting others, preventing timely arrival at muster stations. Others may be incorrectly marked present or absent due to miscommunication. In large crews, manual list reconciliation is time-consuming and prone to error. These inaccuracies can delay evacuation or prompt unnecessary search and rescue efforts, increasing overall risk. The recurring nature of this challenge has driven interest in electronic mustering, but even then, data accuracy and human verification remain critical. Accurate accountability depends on both reliable systems and disciplined procedures.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr941.pdf
Transitioning to electronic mustering introduces technical, organizational, and cultural challenges. Personnel may initially distrust automated data or fear increased surveillance. Integration with existing procedures and systems can be complex, particularly on older installations. Training is required to ensure that crews understand both the technology's capabilities and limitations. There is also a risk of overreliance on electronic data at the expense of human judgment. Regulators typically expect electronic systems to complement, not replace, established methods, which can create parallel processes during transition. Managing this change effectively requires clear communication, phased implementation, and ongoing validation to build confidence and acceptance.
Reference: https://www.identecsolutions.com/news/the-t-card-system-in-the-offshore-oil-and-gas-industry-old-but-gold
Technology failures such as power outages, network disruptions, or device malfunctions can degrade electronic mustering performance at critical moments. Active tracking devices may run out of battery power, and readers or servers may become unavailable if they are not adequately protected. In emergencies, environmental damage can exacerbate these failures. If personnel and leaders rely too heavily on electronic data without understanding fallback procedures, decision-making may be impaired. This risk is mitigated through redundancy, fail-safe design, and clear procedures for reverting to manual mustering. Technology must be treated as an enabler rather than a single point of dependency in offshore safety systems.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/automation.htm
Regulatory frameworks require operators to demonstrate that mustering arrangements are effective, reliable, and understood by personnel. However, regulations may not always specify how electronic systems should be implemented, leading to challenges with interpretation. Operators must balance innovation with compliance, ensuring that new technologies meet safety case requirements and are accepted by regulators. Documentation, validation, and evidence from drills are often required to prove effectiveness. Differences between national jurisdictions can further complicate system design for multinational operators. Regulatory challenges, therefore, shape mustering solutions by emphasizing transparency, reliability, and demonstrable safety benefits over purely technical sophistication.
Reference: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/offshore-safety-directive
Complex layouts with multiple levels, confined spaces, and long travel distances can significantly affect mustering efficiency. Bottlenecks in stairways or corridors may slow movement, while unfamiliar routes can confuse temporary personnel. On floating units or vessels, motion and stability issues further complicate evacuation and mustering. Poorly placed muster stations may expose personnel to hazards or require crossing high-risk zones. These layout-related challenges must be addressed during design and reviewed throughout the asset lifecycle. Simulation, drills, and continuous assessment help ensure that mustering arrangements remain suitable as installations evolve and operational patterns change.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/safety-cases.htm
Key milestones in offshore mustering have often followed major incidents and regulatory reforms. The introduction of formal safety cases, standardized emergency response plans, and mandatory drills significantly improved procedural consistency. Later milestones included the adoption of electronic personnel-on-board systems and integration with access control. Advances in real-time location technologies further enhanced situational awareness. Each milestone reflects a shift toward greater reliability, transparency, and data-driven decision-making. These improvements are usually incremental rather than revolutionary, building on lessons learned from incidents, audits, and technological progress. Understanding these milestones helps contextualize current mustering practices as part of an evolving safety culture.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/history.htm
Drills expose weaknesses by testing mustering procedures under realistic time constraints and simulated stress. They often reveal delays in movement, unclear responsibilities, communication gaps, or equipment failures that are not apparent on paper. Drills may also reveal discrepancies between planned and actual behavior, such as personnel choosing the wrong routes. By capturing performance data and observations, organizations can identify root causes and implement targeted improvements. Without drills, mustering systems risk becoming theoretical constructs disconnected from real-world conditions. Regular, well-designed drills are therefore essential for validating both conventional and electronic mustering arrangements.
Reference: https://www.energyinst.org/training/offshore-drills
Contractors and visitors may be less familiar with installation layouts, alarms, and muster procedures, increasing the risk of confusion during emergencies. High turnover and short assignment durations make consistent training difficult. Language barriers and differing safety cultures can further complicate communication. From an accountability perspective, ensuring that all non-permanent personnel are correctly registered and tracked is a persistent challenge. These factors increase the likelihood of delayed or inaccurate mustering. Effective induction processes, clear signage, and integrated personnel-tracking systems are essential to manage this complexity and ensure everyone on board can be reliably accounted for.
Reference: https://www.identecsolutions.com/news/mustering-report-automatic-accurate-24/7
Communication failures can undermine muster by leading to misunderstandings about alarms, instructions, or muster station status. Damaged public address systems, radio congestion, or unclear messages may lead personnel to take incorrect actions. Inconsistent information between control rooms and muster stations can delay decision-making or lead to false assumptions about personnel status. Communication challenges are particularly acute in noisy or smoke-filled environments. To mitigate this, offshore emergency planning emphasizes redundancy, standardized messages, and trained communicators. Clear, concise communication is essential to align human behavior with mustering procedures when time and clarity are critical.
Reference: https://www.energyinst.org/media/5475/emergency-response.pdf
Safety culture strongly influences how seriously personnel take mustering procedures and drills. In environments where production pressures overshadow safety, individuals may delay response or question alarms. Conversely, strong safety cultures encourage immediate compliance and collective responsibility. Cultural differences in hierarchy and communication styles can also affect how instructions are received and followed. Leadership behavior plays a key role in setting expectations and reinforcing discipline. Mustering performance is therefore not only a technical or procedural issue but a reflection of underlying organizational values and attitudes toward safety.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/safetyculture/index.htm
Lessons from mustering failures are captured through incident investigations, drill debriefs, and safety audits. These processes analyze what went wrong, why it happened, and how systems or behaviors can be improved. Findings may lead to procedural changes, redesign of muster stations, additional training, or technology upgrades. Sharing lessons across assets and organizations is critical to prevent recurrence. Regulators and industry bodies often disseminate anonymized case studies to promote learning. Continuous improvement in mustering depends on a willingness to critically assess performance and act on identified weaknesses.
Reference: https://www.hse.gov.uk/learning/lessons.htm
Mustering is described as a system under stress because it must function precisely when people, infrastructure, and information are most strained. Emergencies degrade normal conditions, challenge assumptions, and expose weaknesses in design and behavior. The system must accommodate uncertainty, incomplete data, and rapidly changing hazards. Both conventional and electronic mustering are tested not by routine operations but by their ability to cope with abnormal situations. Viewing mustering as a stressed system encourages designers and operators to focus on resilience, redundancy, and human-centered design, rather than idealized performance scenarios.
Reference: https://www.energyinst.org/expertise/safety-management
If you are looking for a reliable proven alternative to manual mustering and emergency response processes, and want to improve your safety standards while reducing mustering times and increasing overall efficiency, why not benefit from an automated solution that delivers all crew location data in one dashboard? Learn how to optimise your incident response management through simulation and reduce costly idle time during evacuations and muster drills.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
Industry: Offshore Oil & Gas | Wind Energy | Ship building | Offshore Logistics | Jobs & Roles |
Production Process: Exploration | Construction | Production | Decommissioning | Transport | Refining | Walk-to-Work |
Offshore Installations: FPSO | FLNG | Platforms | SOVs | CTVs | Sub-sea infrastructure | Tankers |
Safety: Access Control | POB | Workplace Safety | Workplace Health | Emergency | Training | e-Mustering | Regulations | Risk Assessment | Safety Assistance Technology |
Activity: Oil | Gas | Wind | Deep Sea Mining |
Areas: North Sea | Middle East | South Atlantic | Indian Ocean | Pacific Ocean |