Most offshore installations are supplied from dedicated onshore bases using offshore service vessels such as platform supply vessels (PSVs) and other offshore support vessels (OSVs). These vessels shuttle between quayside warehouses and multiple installations, carrying deck cargo like pipes, containers and equipment, as well as bulk products such as fuel, drilling mud, cement and potable water stored in dedicated tanks. Voyages are carefully scheduled to align with drilling, construction and production plans while allowing for weather delays. Logistics teams coordinate loading lists, vessel routing, and backloads of waste and used equipment to maintain safe operations and cost efficiency. Classification societies and regulators provide rules for such vessels and their operations. Reference: https://www.dnv.com/maritime/vessel-types/offshore-service-vessels/
The onshore supply base functions as the central hub of the offshore logistics system. It consolidates materials from multiple vendors, performs inspection and packaging, manages customs where relevant and organises temporary storage before loading. Bases typically include warehouses, laydown yards, tank farms for bulk liquids, container staging areas and quays designed for rapid turnaround of PSVs and other OSVs. Modern bases also host marine coordination centres that schedule vessel departures, track cargo documentation and monitor offshore operations in real time. Effective base management reduces vessel idle time and optimises inventory levels offshore by synchronising procurement, storage and sailing schedules. Guidance from industry bodies and technical service companies emphasises the importance of integrated planning between supply bases and offshore assets. Reference: https://www.dnv.com/maritime/offshore/
The workhorses of offshore logistics are offshore service vessels, primarily platform supply vessels, anchor-handling tug supply (AHTS) vessels and various construction or multi-purpose support vessels. PSVs carry most routine deck cargo and bulk consumables to drilling rigs, fixed platforms and FPSOs. AHTS vessels may perform towing and anchor handling while also carrying cargo, especially in early field phases. Construction or subsea support vessels handle heavier, more specialised equipment during installation campaigns. Industry guidelines and class rules define design, stability, cargo handling and safety requirements for these ships, reflecting their role in transporting stores, materials, equipment and personnel to and from offshore installations in often harsh environments. Reference: https://www.dnv.com/maritime/vessel-types/offshore-service-vessels/
Cargo planning starts with demand forecasts from each installation, typically compiled in logistics management systems. Requests for materials, consumables and spare parts are prioritised by safety and operational criticality, followed by cost and volume considerations. Planners then build voyage plans that combine multiple installations, optimising routes, deck layout and bulk tank usage while respecting stability and segregation requirements. Just-in-time delivery is balanced against the risk of weather delays and vessel unavailability. Guidelines such as the Guidelines for Offshore Marine Operations (GOMO) and various OSV management standards emphasise clear communication among marine logistics, offshore supervisors, and vendors, along with robust documentation and pre-sail verification to avoid missing critical items. Reference: https://omtc.ua/images/courses/dp/GOMO.pdf
Offshore inventories are normally managed through computerised maintenance and materials management systems that track usage rates, lead times and criticality of each item. Minimum and reorder levels are set based on consumption history, failure data and the frequency of supply voyages. High-criticality items, such as safety-related spares or components with long procurement times, are often held in larger quantities or duplicated across nearby installations. Inventory data feeds directly into supply base planning, so materials can be picked, packed, and staged for the next suitable vessel. Classification societies and engineering standards organisations highlight the importance of reliable supply chain governance and risk-based planning to maintain technical integrity while keeping costs under control.
Reference: https://www.dnv.com/about/supplychain/
Offshore supply operations sit under several overlapping regulatory frameworks. On the maritime side, offshore support vessels must comply with SOLAS, MARPOL and load line conventions, as well as specialised guidance for OSVs and intact stability codes issued by the International Maritime Organisation. Shelf-state regulators and industry bodies impose additional rules relating to collision risk, emergency preparedness, cargo handling and personnel transfer. Operator guidelines and international best-practice documents address risk assessment, training, communications and permit-to-work systems for marine operations near installations. Together, these regimes aim to control hazards such as vessel-platform collisions, dropped objects, spills and loss of stability while operating close to offshore structures. Reference: https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/Documents/IMO%20safety%20and%20environmental%20regulations%20for%20OSVs%20-%20H%20Deggim.pdf
When supply vessels operate close to fixed platforms or FPSOs, they often use dynamic positioning (DP) systems to maintain precise position and heading without anchors. DP operations follow detailed procedures covering approach, station-keeping, cargo handling and departure, including predefined communication protocols between the vessel bridge and the offshore installation’s marine control. Risk assessments address failure modes such as loss of position, thruster failure or blackouts. International guidelines for DP OSVs specify competence requirements, redundancy levels, equipment testing and operational checklists. These aim to minimise the likelihood of contact with the installation, protect subsea infrastructure and safeguard personnel during cargo transfer and hose or gangway operations. Reference: https://www.imca-int.com/resources/technical-library/document/e25ac45a-c55b-ee11-8def-6045bdd2c3b2/
Weather and sea conditions strongly influence sailing schedules, transfer windows and the choice of vessel for each job. High waves, strong winds, currents and poor visibility can restrict approaches, stop crane operations or halt personnel transfers entirely. Logistics planners, therefore, build contingency into schedules, use meteorological forecasts and sometimes seasonal statistics to decide when to sail and which routes to take. For long-term planning, historical metocean data guides field design and the selection of vessel capabilities, including DP class and freeboard. Industry guidance on marine operations emphasises that no cargo delivery is worth compromising safety and recommends robust stop-work authorities, clearly defined environmental operating limits, and real-time communication between vessels, supply bases, and offshore installations. Reference: https://omtc.ua/images/courses/dp/GOMO.pdf
Backload logistics handle the reverse flow of materials from the installation to shore. This includes used equipment for repair, rental tools being returned, drilling cuttings, scrap metal, and various waste streams, such as general waste, hazardous waste, and slops. Materials must be properly segregated, labelled and documented to meet regulatory and environmental requirements. Deck layout and stability calculations must account for sometimes heavy or awkward backloads. Onshore, waste is routed through certified treatment or disposal facilities, while reusable items re-enter the supply chain. Good practice guidance stresses that poor backload management can impact safety, environmental performance and costs by causing congestion on deck, delays during unloading and non-compliance with waste regulations. Reference: https://www.ospri.online/site/assets/files/1135/jip_finding_3_dispersant_logistics_and_supply_planning-1.pdf
Personnel movements are typically handled by helicopters for speed and flexibility, while vessels handle most cargo. However, some offshore support vessels also carry industrial personnel, subject to specific rules and certifications. Marine and aviation logistics must be closely coordinated to align crew changes with supply runs, minimise bed bottlenecks offshore and make best use of weather windows. Guidelines for the management of small service vessels and offshore support vessels describe requirements for training, life-saving appliances and marine coordination functions. These documents underline the need for clear manifests, communication protocols and emergency procedures to manage the combined movement of people and cargo safely within congested offshore fields. Reference: https://www.energyinst.org/technical/gplus/document-library
Supplying FPSOs shares many similarities with supplying fixed platforms, but introduces extra complexity. FPSOs often weathervane around a turret, changing heading with wind and current, which affects approach patterns and DP strategies. They may be farther offshore in deeper water, increasing sailing distances and exposure to harsh seas. Cargo operations must be coordinated with simultaneous production, tanker offloading, and, at times, flaring, all of which can constrain vessel positions. Mooring lines and subsea risers create additional exclusion zones. Fixed platforms, by contrast, are stationary and often located in more established fields with mature logistics networks. Technical articles on floating production systems highlight the unique marine logistics, mooring interfaces and risk management measures required around FPSOs. Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_production_storage_and_offloading
Operators seek to minimise logistics cost while maintaining high availability and safety. Mathematical optimisation and simulation are increasingly used to size vessel fleets and design routing patterns between multiple supply bases and installations. These models factor in sailing times, service times, cargo capacities, demand profiles and charter conditions. Practical fleet management also considers redundancy for maintenance, spot charters during campaigns and the use of multi-role vessels. Recent research applies vehicle-routing-style models to offshore support logistics, demonstrating significant potential savings compared with simple fixed schedules, provided that variability in weather and operational delays is realistically captured. Reference: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397022134_Fleet_and_Route_Optimization_in_Offshore_Support_Logistics
Supply chain governance for offshore operations relies on a mix of internal company standards and external industry guidance. Organisations such as the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers promote the development and adoption of international technical standards to harmonise safe practices across areas such as marine operations, lifting, collision risk, and emergency response. Certification and advisory companies provide frameworks for managing supply chain risk, ESG performance and compliance. Together, these tools support consistent decision-making on supplier qualification, vessel selection, audit programmes and performance monitoring, helping operators demonstrate that their logistics chains are safe, reliable and environmentally responsible. Reference: https://www.iogp.org/workstreams/engineering/standards/
Digitalisation is reshaping offshore logistics by providing better visibility of cargo, vessels and operations. Tools include vessel tracking systems, electronic manifests, real-time weather and metocean feeds, and integration of maintenance systems with logistics planning. Some operators employ advanced analytics to optimise sailings, reduce fuel consumption and quantify emissions. Classification societies and consultants support these efforts with digital twins, supply chain modelling and performance dashboards that simulate cargo flows and test alternative logistics setups. Over time, such systems help to reduce delays, lower costs, and improve safety by enabling data-driven decision-making and scenario planning for both routine operations and contingency responses. Reference: https://www.dnv.com/article/supply-chain-modelling-shipping-and-logistic-operations-208003/
Offshore wind, subsea construction and other marine sectors face similar challenges in vessel scheduling, weather downtime and safe personnel transfer. Guidance developed for floating offshore wind highlights the importance of coordinated marine logistics, cost control and supply chain resilience when servicing remote offshore infrastructure. Good practice documents on small service vessel management and marine coordination provide transferable insights on traffic management, training and emergency response. Oil and gas operators increasingly benchmark against these sectors, adopting cross-industry best practices for marine coordination centres, standard operating procedures and contractor management, which can enhance efficiency and safety for supply operations to platforms and FPSOs. Reference: https://guidetofloatingoffshorewind.com/guide/o-operations-and-maintenance/o-4-offshore-vessels-and-logistics/
Crew Companion for Safe Energy ensures real-time tracking, automated mustering, access control, and personnel visibility across offshore and onshore installations such as oil rigs and FPSOs. It replaces manual processes for emergency response and POB (Personnel On Board) management, cuts muster times by up to 70%, complies with safety regulations, and integrates with existing flight, vessel, and access systems.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
The two dominant options for moving crude oil from offshore fields to shore are subsea pipelines and shuttle tankers. Export pipelines move stabilised crude directly from platforms or FPSOs to coastal terminals or refineries, offering continuous flow and low operating cost once installed. Where pipelines are technically difficult or uneconomic, operators use dedicated shuttle tankers that load offshore and sail to onshore terminals. Shuttle tankers are widespread in regions such as the North Sea and offshore Brazil and are equipped with dynamic positioning and offshore loading systems so they can safely load from FPSOs or loading buoys in harsh weather. Reference: https://www.dnv.com/expert-story/maritime-impact/Shuttle-tankers-safe-flexible-efficient/
Most offshore gas is exported through subsea pipelines that carry gas (sometimes with condensate) from platforms or subsea manifolds to onshore processing plants and pipeline networks, as seen in projects like Ichthys and Barossa supplying Darwin in Australia. Where distances are long or pipelines are constrained, gas can be processed offshore into liquefied natural gas (LNG) on floating or onshore plants and then transported by LNG carriers. Gas may also be partially used as fuel offshore or reinjected to support reservoir pressure. The chosen export route reflects field size, distance to shore, seabed conditions, market access and host-country strategy for domestic use versus export.
Reference: https://www.inpex.com.au/projects/ichthys-lng/
Export pipelines are typically preferred for long-lived fields relatively close to shore, where high upfront capital can be justified by low per-barrel transport cost and continuous flow. Shuttle tankers become attractive for remote, deepwater or marginal fields where seabed conditions, water depth, geopolitics or environmental constraints make pipelines costly or risky. Tankers offer flexibility: they can be redeployed between fields, scaled with production and routed to different terminals or refineries as market conditions change. However, they introduce scheduling, weather-downtime and marine risk considerations that pipelines largely avoid. Many provinces use a mix of both systems, with pipelines for core infrastructure and shuttle tankers for satellite or frontier developments.
Reference: https://www.dnv.com/expert-story/maritime-impact/Shuttle-tankers-safe-flexible-efficient/
FPSOs combine production, storage and offloading functions on a single vessel. Well fluids are processed onboard to stabilise crude, which is stored in large cargo tanks in the hull. The FPSO then serves as an offshore terminal: oil is periodically offloaded to shuttle tankers via offshore loading systems, or in some cases exported through an export pipeline to shore. This architecture is particularly valuable in deepwater or remote areas lacking seabed pipeline infrastructure or port facilities. Gas from the same wells may be reinjected, used as fuel, exported via pipeline or processed for LNG, depending on project design and regulations on flaring. Reference: https://www.ifsolutions.com/floating-production-storage-offloading-fpso/
In a typical FPSO–shuttle tanker offloading, the tanker approaches the FPSO under dynamic positioning and connects to an offshore loading system such as a bow loading arrangement or submerged turret loading (STL). A hose string transfers stabilised crude from the FPSO’s cargo tanks to the shuttle tanker’s tanks at controlled rates, monitored for pressure, temperature and cargo quality. Strict procedures govern approach, mooring, communications, emergency shutdown and disconnect to prevent collision or spills, especially in harsh seas. Once loading is complete, the tanker sails to an onshore terminal or refinery. This operation may occur while the FPSO continues producing, so simultaneous operations are carefully risk-assessed and managed. Reference: https://www.rigzone.com/training/insight?insight_id=357
Subsea export systems often use a network of flowlines and manifolds to gather production from multiple wells and sometimes multiple fields, tying them back to a central processing facility such as a fixed platform or FPSO. From there, treated oil and gas are routed into larger-diameter export pipelines that run to shore or to larger trunk lines. This “hub and spoke” architecture allows smaller satellite fields to share export infrastructure, improving project economics. Design must handle multiphase flow, pressure drop, and transient behaviour across different wells, while remaining within operating envelopes for wax, hydrates, and corrosion. Standards and recommended practices from organisations like DNV provide guidance on design, materials selection and integrity management for such integrated systems. Reference: https://www.dnv.com/energy/services/subsea-facilities/world-class-codes/
In LNG value chains, offshore wells produce gas that is either piped directly to onshore liquefaction plants or processed on floating LNG (FLNG) units. At the plant, gas is treated to remove impurities and heavy components, then cooled to around −162°C to become LNG, reducing its volume by about 600 times. LNG is stored in insulated tanks and loaded onto LNG carriers for shipment to importing terminals, where it is regasified and injected into local gas networks or used as fuel. Offshore projects such as Ichthys and emerging FLNG schemes in Mozambique and Congo illustrate different configurations, all linking offshore reservoirs, long export pipelines or FLNG units, and global LNG markets.
Reference: https://www.mhi.com/technology/review/offshore_deployment_lng_supply_chain
Flow assurance is the discipline of ensuring that hydrocarbons can move from reservoir to market without unplanned blockages or unsafe conditions. In offshore export pipelines, temperature and pressure changes can cause wax, hydrates, scale or asphaltenes to form, potentially blocking lines or damaging equipment. Engineers use modelling tools to predict these risks and design insulation, heating, chemical injection, pigging and operating procedures to maintain safe, stable flow. Flow assurance also covers slugging, erosion and corrosion. Poorly managed, these issues can halt production, increase operating costs and raise safety and environmental risks. Recent research and case studies from deepwater fields show that robust flow assurance planning is essential from early design through operations. Reference: https://scispace.com/pdf/flow-assurance-in-subsea-pipeline-design-a-case-study-of-1ry441m4aw.pdf
Offshore pipelines are managed through integrity management systems that combine design safety margins, risk assessment, inspection, monitoring and maintenance. Inline inspection tools, ROV surveys, corrosion monitoring and cathodic protection checks are used to track degradation. Leak detection technologies range from computational methods using flow and pressure data to external sensors and acoustic systems. DNV’s recommended practices, such as DNV-RP-F116 for integrity management and DNV-RP-F302 for offshore leak detection, provide structured guidance on threat identification, monitoring strategies and response planning. Effective integrity management helps prevent or quickly detect leaks, reducing environmental impact, safety risk and downtime. Reference: https://www.dnv.com/energy/standards-guidelines/dnv-rp-f302-offshore-leak-detection/
Long-distance deepwater pipelines, such as the ~890 km Ichthys gas export line to Darwin, must cope with high external pressure, seabed geohazards and challenging installation conditions. Pipe strength, buckle resistance, on-bottom stability and route selection around canyons or slopes are critical. Thermal management is more complex because fluids cool over long distances in cold deepwater, increasing the risk of hydrates and wax, so insulation, active heating or special operating procedures may be required. Installation often uses specialised lay vessels and careful welding and testing regimes. Codes and recommended practices for submarine pipelines provide design factors, safety classes and methodologies tailored to these demanding environments. Reference: https://www.inpex.com.au/projects/ichthys-lng/
Custody transfer is the fiscal handover point where ownership of oil or gas changes, typically between the upstream operator and the pipeline company, terminal or buyer. Accurate metering at this point is essential, as even small errors can lead to significant financial discrepancies over time. Offshore, metering skids may be installed on platforms or FPSOs; alternatively, the fiscal metering point may be onshore at the receiving terminal. Systems use calibrated flowmeters, density and temperature measurement, and quality sampling to determine energy content. International standards and industry guidelines specify performance, calibration and uncertainty limits. For LNG, loading meters and tank gauging govern custody transfer during ship loading and unloading, underpinned by detailed LNG measurement standards. Reference: https://www.dnv.com/energy/services/pipelines/
FLNG facilities move liquefaction from shore to the field, allowing stranded or remote offshore gas resources to be monetised without long export pipelines and large onshore plants. Gas is processed and liquefied onboard the FLNG unit, stored in marine tanks and offloaded directly to LNG carriers. Projects such as Coral South in Mozambique and upcoming Coral Norte illustrate this concept, enabling LNG export from deepwater fields far offshore. FLNG can reduce the need for coastal land, simplify permitting and support phased development, but it introduces complex offshore cryogenic systems, marine motions and combined safety challenges. It is one of the most visible innovations reshaping gas export strategies from offshore basins. Reference: https://www.eni.com/en-IT/actions/global-activities/republic-congo/lng.html
When a field reaches the end of life, export pipelines and loading systems must be decommissioned in line with regulations and environmental standards. Options include full removal, partial removal with sections left buried, or long-term abandonment in situ after cleaning and isolation. Detailed studies assess residual hydrocarbons, stability, interference with fishing or navigation and potential reuse. In some cases, existing pipelines can be repurposed for new fields, CO₂ transport for carbon capture and storage, or other fluids, subject to integrity verification and requalification in accordance with updated codes. Regulatory frameworks are evolving as more early offshore developments reach decommissioning, demanding robust planning from the concept stage.
Reference: https://www.dnv.com/energy/services/pipelines/
In harsh or remote environments such as the North Atlantic, Arctic or cyclone-prone basins, export systems must withstand extreme waves, currents, ice and low temperatures. For pipelines, this affects routing, burial depth, materials selection and thermal insulation, which also supports flow assurance. For shuttle tankers and FPSOs, dynamic positioning capability, station-keeping systems and robust moorings become critical, as do procedures for safe offloading in adverse weather. LNG projects in such regions must manage ice loads, low-temperature operations and sometimes seasonal access constraints. Real-world projects and design codes developed for the northern North Sea and Arctic fields provide much of the current best practice.
Reference: https://www.dnv.com/expert-story/maritime-impact/Shuttle-tankers-safe-flexible-efficient/
Decarbonisation pressures are reshaping export choices and designs. Operators seek to minimise flaring by routing more gas to market via pipelines or LNG, including FLNG, and by using low-emission technologies in liquefaction, compression and power generation. Pipeline and shipping operations are increasingly optimised using digital tools to reduce fuel consumption and methane emissions, and there is growing interest in using existing export corridors for CO₂ transport to offshore storage sites. Some projects explicitly adopt “zero-routine-flaring” or reduced-methane designs as part of licensing and financing conditions. Over time, these trends could favour gas-to-LNG chains and CO₂ pipelines alongside, or eventually instead of, traditional crude export systems. Reference: https://www.eni.com/en-IT/actions/global-activities/republic-congo/lng.html
Back to top ˄Where harsh conditions exist and your next location is hours away, Crew Companion is the answer for the safety of your staff; a scalable and customisable personnel monitoring solution to meet your organisation’s safety needs in onshore and offshore operations. It provides automated personnel safety assistance, access control and workflow optimisation – all in line with the most stringent HSE and business requirements.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
The principal hazards during offshore oil export include hydrocarbon leaks, fires or explosions following release, collisions between vessels and the installation (e.g., a tanker with a Floating Production Storage and Offloading / FPSO), structural fatigue, and environmental exposure. Released crude oil or gas may ignite, forming explosive vapour clouds, or spill into the sea, causing environmental damage. These risks are heightened by harsh weather, wave motion, dynamic positioning manoeuvres or mechanical failures in loading equipment. Proper safety barriers, emergency shutdown, strict procedures and robust design are required to mitigate hazard probabilities.
Floating units such as FPSOs are subject to constant motion due to waves, wind, and currents, which induce structural stresses and complicate vessel approaches or mooring. Such motion impacts safe cargo transfer, offshore loading and makes tanker approach more difficult, increasing risk of collision or dropped loads. Over time, structural fatigue can degrade the integrity of hull, tanks or mooring systems. Long-term exposure offshore also means limited access to maintenance facilities. These factors raise marine-hazard levels compared to fixed platforms, requiring careful design, regular inspection, and conservative operational procedures. Reference: cabmakassar.org
Offshore pipelines face risks including corrosion, material fatigue, external damage (e.g., from anchors or fishing gear), and release due to structural failure. Internal factors such as multiphase flow, pressure/temperature swings, wax, hydrates or asphaltene deposition can impair flow, exert pressure loads or cause blockages — potentially leading to overpressure or rupture. Monitoring and maintenance are vital, as ageing infrastructure or inadequate inspection regimes may increase the likelihood of leaks or catastrophic failures. Recent research underscores that even with modern design, unexpected events remain a credible risk. Reference: ResearchGate
Many incidents stem not only from technical failures but from human or organisational shortcomings: inadequate procedures, insufficient training, poor communication, or neglect of hazard-aware planning. Logistic complexity — coordinating supply vessels, export tankers, maintenance, personnel transfers — demands rigorous management; failure may lead to misloaded cargo, forgotten maintenance, or unsafe transfers. Post-accident analyses in multiple offshore disasters consistently point to systemic human or management failures rather than purely technical causes. Reference: National Academies
Adverse weather, rough seas, high waves, strong currents and storms can delay vessel arrivals, prevent safe loading or offloading, complicate mooring and make positioning difficult — all of which may halt operations for days or weeks. This causes supply bottlenecks, delays in crew changes, and a backlog of materials or waste. Moreover, harsh marine conditions increase fatigue on structures, raise the risk of marine collisions, and heighten danger during cargo transfer or personnel movement. Effective planning must include weather windows, standby resources and conservative safety margins. Reference: memorial.scholaris.ca
Leaks or blowouts can rapidly release oil or gas into the marine environment, harming ecosystems, coastal habitats and marine life. An uncontrolled release might form oil slicks or underwater plumes, with long-term environmental damage — especially if remote and difficult to access. In addition to ecological harm, environmental spills can incur regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and high clean-up costs. Historically, many offshore accidents have involved major releases, with significant impacts on human safety and the environment. Reference: JRC Publications Repository
Storage tanks within FPSOs accumulate sediments, sludge, waxes or scale over time, particularly on horizontal surfaces and low-flow areas. These build-ups reduce tank capacity, obstruct internal inspections and complicate cleaning, increasing the risk of undetected corrosion, structural weakness or contamination of oil cargo. Scale may also impact flow during offloading. Cleaning and maintenance of such tanks is challenging offshore, since access is limited and shutdowns are costly. These issues can degrade the reliability of exports and increase safety hazards during tank entries or maintenance. Reference: Eagle.org
Modern offshore platforms, export systems and pipelines increasingly rely on digital control, SCADA, IIoT and remote monitoring. While these improve efficiency and situational awareness, they also expand the attack surface for cyber threats. A successful cyber intrusion or system failure could disrupt safety systems, leak detection, automated shutdowns or communications — potentially leading to uncontrolled releases, collisions or delayed response to incidents. Given the remote location of offshore assets, cyber-physical risks thus become a serious safety and environmental concern. Reference: arXiv
Offshore operations often involve multiple supply vessels, shuttle tankers, maintenance ships, crew transfer vessels — all operating under tight schedules, varying weather and overlapping tasks. The coordination required to safely load/unload cargo, conduct maintenance and manage personnel movements is substantial. Complexity increases the risk of human error, mis-timing, miscommunication, or conflict with marine traffic. Poorly managed logistics can magnify the impact of a single failure, leading to cascading delays or accidents. Effective risk management needs robust planning, coordination, real-time monitoring and clear allocation of responsibilities. Reference: Rcademy
Operators must comply with maritime regulations (safety, stability, pollution), environmental laws (discharge limits, waste handling), and industry-specific standards for offshore pipelines, loading operations and structural integrity. Regulatory frameworks may differ across jurisdictions, especially for fields in international waters or across national boundaries. Ensuring compliance requires correct documentation, regular inspections, audit trails, and readiness for inspections from authorities. Non-compliance can lead to shutdowns, fines or revocation of licences — but aligning international, national and company standards remains a key challenge. Reference: cabmakassar.org
As pipelines, FPSOs and support systems age, degradation through corrosion, fatigue, repeated loading, environmental exposure and mechanical wear accumulates. If maintenance is deferred or inspection intervals are extended — perhaps due to cost pressures or logistical delays — small defects may grow into critical failures such as leaks, ruptures, or structural collapse. This increases risk for personnel, environment and commercial continuity. Given the long lifespans of many offshore fields, good asset integrity management and planned maintenance are essential to avoid catastrophic failures. Reference: Eagle.org
Back to top ˄If you are looking for a reliable proven alternative to manual mustering and emergency response processes, and want to improve your safety standards while reducing mustering times and increasing overall efficiency, why not benefit from an automated solution that delivers all crew location data in one dashboard? Learn how to optimise your incident response management through simulation and reduce costly idle time during evacuations and muster drills.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
An FPSO typically has two tightly coordinated teams: the marine side and the production side. Marine personnel (e.g., Offshore Installation Manager or Master, marine superintendent, deck, engine, cargo/ballast, mooring, and offtake teams) ensure stationkeeping, stability, cargo handling, heading control, and marine safety. Production personnel (e.g., production superintendent, control room operators, mechanical/electrical/instrument technicians, utilities, and lab) run separation, compression, power generation, and utilities. Support functions include HSE, medic, logistics, catering, and housekeeping. Clear interfaces are critical where marine and process risks meet: tandem loading, SIMOPS, and emergency response. Operators benchmark their marine organization, procedures, and documentation against industry guidance to assure competence and consistent practice during operations and offtake. Ref
New or returning offshore workers generally complete OPITO-approved Basic Offshore Safety Induction and Emergency Training (BOSIET), which covers helicopter safety and escape, sea survival, basic firefighting, first aid, and emergency breathing systems; it is then refreshed periodically via FOET. Marine-certified personnel must also comply with the IMO STCW Convention, covering training, certification, and watchkeeping for seafarers. Companies layer role-specific authorizations (e.g., permit to work, confined space entry, lifting, H2S) on top of these baselines. Records are tracked in centralized registries, and validity is verified prior to flight. This training matrix underpins emergency readiness, safe helicopter travel, and baseline competence for life and work on remote installations. Ref
Rotations and shift systems are designed to manage cumulative fatigue, particularly for 24/7 production and marine watchkeeping. Good practice uses risk-based limits on shift length, night work, and minimum rest, backed by monitoring, supervisor interventions, and sleeping-environment controls. While specific FPSO policies vary by flag and regulator, baseline rest protections from the Maritime Labour Convention require at least 10 hours’ rest in any 24 hours and 77 hours in seven days, with records kept and exceptions tightly controlled. Many operators supplement these legal minima with human-factors guidance to plan shift schedules, manage overtime, and design fatigue-resistant tasks. Ref
Living arrangements are regulated to ensure decent accommodation, adequate ventilation/noise control, sanitary facilities, and access to recreation. Food and drinking water must be sufficient, nutritious, and hygienically prepared by trained catering personnel, with periodic inspection and documentation. Most operators exceed the minimum with gyms, internet access policies, film rooms, and dedicated quiet areas to support recovery. The Maritime Labour Convention’s Title 3 sets the baseline for accommodation and for food and catering, and flag-state notices further detail compliance and inspection criteria. On FPSOs, designers also consider motion, vibration, and noise from heavy equipment when locating accommodation modules. Ref
Helicopter logistics are the lifeline for crew changes and medevacs. Operators follow helideck siting and obstacle clearance rules, firefighting equipment requirements, lighting, and procedures set by aviation authorities. Crew undergo helicopter safety and escape training and, where required, compressed-air emergency breathing (CA-EBS). Pre-flight briefings, baggage rules, and weather minima are standardized. Helideck crews maintain emergency response readiness for deck incidents and aircraft fire scenarios, and procedures integrate with the installation’s emergency plan and temporary refuge routes. The definitive reference is CAP 437, which sets minimum standards for offshore helicopter landing areas and is widely cited by regulators. Ref
Conditions of employment depend on the flag, coastal state, and employment contract, but the Maritime Labour Convention provides a widely adopted foundation. It sets minimum hours of rest, requires accessible grievance procedures, and establishes principles for wages, leave, and repatriation. Title 2 covers employment conditions; Title 5 deals with compliance and enforcement, incl
uding flag- and port-state inspections. Company policies may exceed these minima, especially in harsh environments or for extended rotations. Routine internal and external audits check conformity of records, postings, and crew feedback to MLC requirements. Ref
Beyond providing varied, nutritious meals, catering teams must meet hygiene, storage, and preparation standards, with documented temperature control, potable water checks, and pest management. The MLC’s Regulation 3.2 mandates that food and drinking water be provided free of charge under regulated hygienic conditions and that catering staff be trained and competent; several flag administrations publish detailed implementing notices on training and galley organization. Regular inspections and crew feedback loops ensure menu quality, cultural considerations, and dietary needs are addressed during long hitches. References: MLC 2006, Regulation 3.2; UK guidance on food and catering under MLC. Ref
Industry: Offshore Oil & Gas | Wind Energy | Ship building | Offshore Logistics | Jobs & Roles |
Production Process: Exploration | Construction | Production | Decommissioning | Transport | Refining | Walk-to-Work |
Offshore Installations: FPSO | FLNG | Platforms | SOVs | CTVs | Sub-sea infrastructure | Tankers |
Safety: Access Control | POB | Workplace Safety | Workplace Health | Emergency | Training | Mustering | Regulations | Risk Assessment | Safety Assistance Technology |
Activity: Oil | Gas | Wind | Deep Sea Mining |
Areas: North Sea | Middle East | South Atlantic | Indian Ocean | Pacific Ocean |