Remote-controlled equipment follows commands from a nearby operator, commonly through a handheld radio controller and often within line of sight. Tele-remote equipment is also continuously directed by a person, but cameras, audio, telemetry and a communications network allow control from a distant station. Semi-autonomous machines execute defined functions, such as tramming along a mapped route, while an operator supervises exceptions or performs complex tasks. Fully autonomous equipment perceives its environment, plans actions and completes an assigned cycle within a defined operating domain without continuous human control. These categories describe increasing machine authority, not absolute intelligence. A machine may therefore be autonomous for travel but remotely operated for loading, recovery or maintenance. ref
Line-of-sight radio control lets an operator stand outside an underground loader while directly commanding steering, propulsion, bucket and braking functions. It is frequently used for mucking in open stopes, drawpoints or other areas where unsupported ground, rockfall or poor visibility makes remaining in the cab undesirable. The operator must select a protected position that preserves a clear view of both the machine and travel area, while maintaining separation from pinch points and escape restrictions. Compared with tele-remote operation, the arrangement needs less fixed communications infrastructure, but its working range and productivity are constrained by sightlines. Safe use depends on reliable deadman controls, emergency stopping, machine-specific transmitter pairing, exclusion zones, inspections and disciplined operating procedures. ref
Autonomous and tele-remote load-haul-dump machines, or LHDs, move blasted rock between a drawpoint, orepass, stockpile or truck-loading point without requiring an operator in the cab. In tele-remote mode, a person drives through video and machine data from a protected station. In autonomous mode, the LHD can follow mapped routes, regulate speed, avoid defined obstacles and repeat haul cycles, while loading or unusual situations may remain supervised. Underground LHD automation is especially valuable after blasting and in stopes exposed to rockfall because it separates people from the production area. A complete system normally combines machine controls, localisation, route maps, wireless communications, access barriers, traffic rules and a control interface rather than relying on the vehicle alone. ref
Modern drill rigs can automate navigation to a planned location, levelling, rod handling, hole positioning, collaring, penetration control, depth and angle control, and reporting of actual drilling results. On a production or development pattern, the control system can receive a digital drill plan and execute multiple holes with consistent geometry while adjusting operating parameters to changing rock response. Remote supervision allows one operator to monitor the rig from a protected area and intervene for faults, unexpected ground conditions or consumable changes. Automation improves repeatability and reduces exposure to noise, vibration, dust and unstable faces, but it does not remove the need for accurate survey control, ground assessment, exclusion management, pre-start checks and verification that drilled holes match the blast design. ref
Longwall automation coordinates the shearer, powered roof supports and armored face conveyor so coal extraction progresses along the face with less manual intervention in the highest-risk area. Navigation and sensing determine the equipment’s three-dimensional position and help keep the shearer aligned with the planned seam horizon. Control logic advances roof supports, manages cutting sequences and provides operators with remote status and diagnostic information. Operators generally supervise from a protected control location and respond to geological changes, obstructions or equipment faults rather than manually guiding every movement. The system can improve face alignment, production consistency and worker separation from dust, moving machinery and ground-control hazards. Its effectiveness still depends on maintained sensors, accurate calibration, reliable communications and well-controlled access to the longwall face. ref
Continuous miners, roof bolters and haulage units can automate selected parts of roadway development, although fully people-free continuous operation remains technically demanding. A continuous miner may use inertial navigation and machine guidance to maintain position, heading, grade and horizon under remote supervision. Its position data can support coordinated bolting and haulage, reducing manual surveying and improving adherence to the mine plan. Automated bolters can control drilling and installation sequences, while shuttle cars or continuous haulage systems can use route guidance and interlocks. Integration is crucial because cutting, ground support, ventilation extension and material removal form one dependent cycle. Mines must also manage changing geology, cables, water, people, intersections and equipment faults that may fall outside the automated system’s intended operating conditions. ref
Autonomous drones and ground robots inspect places that are difficult, time-consuming or unsafe for people to enter. Typical tasks include mapping open stopes and old workings, measuring volumes, inspecting orepasses and raises, checking ground conditions, locating damage, and gathering imagery after an incident. Because satellite positioning is unavailable underground, these platforms commonly use LiDAR, cameras, inertial sensors and simultaneous localisation and mapping to navigate and build three-dimensional models. Autonomy is particularly useful beyond visual line of sight or where radio communication becomes intermittent. Inspection robots normally complement rather than replace geotechnical judgement: specialists still define the mission, review data quality and decide whether conditions are safe. Operational controls must address battery endurance, loss of communications, entanglement, falling objects and recovery of a disabled platform. ref
Surface autonomous haulage usually operates large trucks on comparatively broad, mapped road networks with satellite positioning, dedicated loading and dumping areas, and controlled interaction zones. Underground systems work in narrow, GPS-denied tunnels with restricted passing space, sharper communication constraints and frequent changes to the mine layout. They therefore depend more heavily on local maps, onboard ranging sensors, beacons or inertial localisation, and strict intersection and access control. Both environments use dispatching, speed management, obstacle detection and supervisory control, but underground vehicles must also cope with confined clearances, ventilation doors, gradients, degraded visibility and evacuation routes. Surface experience demonstrates the value of system-level fleet control, yet an underground deployment requires its own validated operating domain and cannot simply copy surface assumptions. ref
Underground autonomous machines typically combine LiDAR or laser scanners, cameras, radar, wheel encoders, inertial measurement units and machine-state sensors. LiDAR and cameras perceive tunnel geometry and obstacles; radar remains useful in dust, water spray or darkness; encoders estimate travel; and inertial instruments track motion and orientation without satellite signals. The control system fuses these inputs with a surveyed or continuously updated mine map to localise the machine and plan movement. Tags, markers or fixed beacons may provide additional reference points. No single sensor is dependable in every underground condition, so complementary sensing and confidence checks are important. Navigation design must account for feature-poor headings, reflective surfaces, changing stockpiles, sensor contamination, vibration and map changes caused by development or ground movement. ref
Underground automation may use leaky feeder radio, industrial Wi-Fi, private LTE or 5G, fibre backbones, Ethernet, mesh links and purpose-built machine radio. The appropriate combination depends on bandwidth, latency, coverage, mobility, resilience and whether the function is operational or safety-related. Tele-remote video and control require predictable low latency and sufficient upstream capacity, while autonomous machines can continue selected onboard functions with less continuous traffic but still need supervision and status exchange. Fibre commonly forms the high-capacity backbone, with wireless access points extending coverage into active areas. The network should include redundant paths where justified, monitored performance, power backup and controlled handover between cells. Safety functions must fail safely and should not assume that an ordinary data network is continuously available. ref
Mining automation normally uses layered control. Safety-critical functions such as braking, steering limits and emergency stopping remain on the machine, where response does not depend on a distant server. Onboard autonomy interprets sensors, localises the vehicle and executes assigned movements. A supervisory layer allocates tasks, manages routes, traffic and operating zones, and presents alarms to controllers. Fleet or mine-management systems connect production plans, equipment status and performance data across multiple machines. Remote operator stations provide direct control or exception handling when autonomy reaches a condition it cannot resolve. This distribution avoids making one component responsible for every decision and supports degraded modes. Interfaces, authority boundaries, time synchronisation and safe fallback behaviour must be explicitly defined, particularly when equipment from different suppliers shares the operating area. ref
A collision-warning system detects a person, vehicle or object within a defined risk area and informs the operator through visual, audible or haptic alerts. The operator remains responsible for taking action. A collision-avoidance system adds automatic intervention, such as reducing speed or inhibiting hazardous motion, when risk reaches a specified threshold. More advanced autonomous machines may also plan a different path, although general collision-avoidance standards distinguish this from simple braking or motion inhibition. Performance depends on detection coverage, position accuracy, stopping distance, machine speed, environmental conditions and the type of target. Neither technology justifies unrestricted mixing of people and machines. Mines should use it within a broader hierarchy that includes separation, traffic rules, visibility controls, verified braking and clearly defined system limitations. ref
Battery-electric and autonomous technologies can be combined in loaders, trucks and drills to reduce diesel emissions while enabling remote or automated production. Electric drivetrains provide precise controllability and extensive machine data, but automation must also manage battery state, charging or swapping, thermal limits and the location of charging infrastructure. Fleet logic can schedule opportunity charging during queueing, shift changes or other planned idle periods and prevent a vehicle from accepting a task it cannot complete with its remaining energy. Lower exhaust and heat loads can reduce ventilation demand, although electrical and battery hazards require dedicated controls. Mines should model the full duty cycle, gradients, payload, ambient temperature and charger availability because an automation system cannot compensate for an undersized energy strategy or poorly located charging points. ref
Many existing machines can be retrofitted with remote-control interfaces, sensors, cameras, communications hardware and software, especially when the original control system exposes suitable hydraulic or electronic functions. Retrofit projects can extend asset value and provide a staged entry into automation without replacing an entire fleet. Feasibility depends on machine condition, braking and steering architecture, diagnostic access, available space, electromagnetic compatibility and the ability to achieve required safety integrity. A retrofit must be engineered as a machine modification, not treated as an accessory installation. The mine and supplier should reassess hazards, validate stopping and loss-of-signal behaviour, update documentation and train operators and maintainers. Older machines with limited electronic control or uncertain documentation may require extensive redesign and can be poor candidates for higher autonomy. ref
Autonomous equipment requires a digital operating environment that connects communications, positioning, fleet coordination, production data and safety systems. A fleet platform assigns work and prevents route conflicts; a positioning layer tracks mobile assets and people; and the mine network transports commands, telemetry, video and alarms. Interfaces with planning, maintenance and reporting systems connect short-interval execution to the mine plan and equipment health. Accurate maps, time synchronisation, identity management and event logging are equally important. The platform should provide role-based views for controllers, supervisors and maintainers rather than one overloaded dashboard. Open, governed interfaces reduce duplicate data and help mixed fleets coexist, but integration must preserve clear authority for safety functions. Automation performance is therefore limited by the quality of the surrounding operational platform, not only by machine capability. ref
You as the operator of a large mine know best how difficult and stressful it can be to precisely locate your entire workforce in time with the blast schedule. Harsh environments like mines are places where safety matters most. Blocked tunnels, disrupted communication lines and blackouts will make an evacuation a chaotic nightmare even for a well-trained team. Locating employees in a timely manner is crucial.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
Early automation is most effective in repetitive, measurable tasks performed within a controllable area. Common candidates include LHD tramming between fixed drawpoints and orepasses, production drilling from digital plans, haulage on defined routes, and inspection of inaccessible openings. Remote control is especially attractive where the task is less predictable but worker exposure is high, such as mucking beneath unsupported ground or clearing a hang-up. Selection should consider safety exposure, cycle repeatability, communications coverage, equipment readiness, process stability and the value of additional operating time. Mines should avoid choosing a pilot solely because a machine is available. A well-bounded use case with clear interfaces, baseline data and manageable exceptions is more likely to produce transferable operational learning and a credible business case. ref
Implementation should begin with the operating problem, defined benefits and a system-level risk assessment rather than with equipment procurement. The mine should document the intended operating domain, task boundaries, interaction with people and conventional vehicles, communications needs, map quality, emergency arrangements and responsibilities shared with suppliers. A staged plan usually progresses from factory and isolated-site testing through a restricted pilot, controlled production and wider deployment. Acceptance criteria should cover safety functions, production performance, maintainability, cybersecurity, training and recovery from foreseeable faults. Consultation with operators, maintainers, engineers and emergency teams is essential because automation changes work beyond the cab. Configuration control, management of change and periodic reassessment must continue as headings advance, software changes or additional machines enter the system. ref
Autonomous machines rely on a digital representation of drifts, intersections, dumping points, restricted zones and permitted routes. If the map is inaccurate or outdated, a machine may localise poorly, select an invalid route or encounter an obstruction outside its expected operating domain. Underground layouts change continually through development, rehabilitation, ground movement, ventilation work and temporary services, so survey updates must flow into the automation system through a controlled process. The mine should define who can approve changes, how versions are distributed, how machines confirm the correct version and how discrepancies are reported. Live sensor data can improve maps, but it should not silently overwrite the authorised mine plan. Safe operations require reconciliation between surveyed geometry, physical signs or barriers, and the configuration used by fleet control. ref
Tele-remote operation needs stable coverage, predictable latency, adequate upstream bandwidth and controlled packet loss throughout the machine’s working area. Multiple camera feeds usually create the largest continuous bandwidth demand, while control commands require low and consistent delay. Jitter or frozen video can be as hazardous as complete disconnection because the operator may act on stale information. Network design should therefore set measurable service levels, prioritise critical traffic, monitor performance and provide overlap or redundancy where a handover could interrupt control. The machine must enter a defined safe state when communications fall outside limits. Coverage testing should reflect real conditions, including moving equipment, intersections, dust, water and damaged antennas. Average signal strength alone is insufficient; end-to-end control and video performance must be validated under load. ref
A mixed fleet needs explicit rules for interactions among autonomous machines, remotely operated units, conventional vehicles and pedestrians. Mines commonly separate operating zones physically or procedurally, control entry through permissions or barriers, and manage intersections with traffic logic, lights or dispatch authority. Real-time location data can show who and what is inside each zone, while machine systems enforce speed and route constraints. Everyone must understand machine status and right-of-way, including contractors and occasional visitors. Transition points where control changes from manual to autonomous deserve particular attention. Because different suppliers may represent position, alarms and stopping logic differently, the mine should test interfaces and define one site-wide traffic model. Technology supports separation, but disciplined access control and understandable operating rules remain fundamental. ref
Teleoperation moves the operator from the machine cab to a connected workstation, sometimes on the surface or at a distant operations centre. Controls may resemble the physical machine, but the operator perceives the task through cameras, microphones, graphics, alarms and telemetry rather than direct motion and peripheral vision. The workstation therefore needs suitable displays, intuitive controls, ergonomic seating, communication with underground personnel and clear indication of latency or degraded sensing. Remote work reduces exposure to vibration, dust, heat and travel hazards and can make mining roles more accessible. It also changes workload: an operator may supervise several machines, manage interruptions or experience reduced sensory cues. Staffing, breaks, handovers, competency assessment and supervisor support should be designed around these new demands. ref
A remote operator needs enough timely information to control the machine safely without being physically present. This normally includes forward, rear and task-specific camera views; machine speed and direction; articulation or boom position; braking and steering status; payload or bucket state; warnings; communication quality; and the locations of relevant people, vehicles and boundaries. Audio can reveal engine load, rock contact or alarms, while map overlays provide wider context that cameras cannot show. Information should be prioritised so critical states remain obvious and alarm flooding is avoided. The interface must indicate stale, missing or uncertain data rather than presenting it as current. Remote-control safety requirements also demand dependable control allocation, emergency stopping and prevention of unintended commands from another station or transmitter. ref
Automation can reduce pauses associated with operator travel, shift changes, blast clearance and exposure restrictions. A remotely supervised LHD may resume work without waiting for an operator to reach the cab, and an autonomous tramming cycle can continue consistently while one controller manages exceptions. These gains are only realised when the supporting process is ready: drawpoints must be available, routes clear, communications stable and maintenance responsive. Automation can otherwise move waiting time to a different constraint, such as truck availability, blocked orepasses or slow fault recovery. Mines should compare total cycle performance rather than machine movement alone. Productive time should also exclude unsafe or out-of-specification operation; the objective is repeatable, controlled production with fewer exposure hours, not merely maximum machine utilisation. ref
Automated equipment adds sensors, computers, software, communications and safety circuits to the mechanical and hydraulic maintenance scope. Maintenance teams must inspect cameras and scanners, clean sensing surfaces, verify calibration, manage software versions, diagnose networks and test interlocks in addition to servicing the base machine. Condition and diagnostic data can support earlier fault detection, but only when alarms are reviewed and data quality is trusted. Work on an autonomous machine requires secure isolation of propulsion, implements, stored energy and remote commands; disabling normal automation does not by itself make the machine safe. The mine should maintain approved configurations, spare electronic components and vendor support arrangements. Post-maintenance functional tests must demonstrate that both production controls and safety responses still operate correctly before the machine returns to its automated zone. ref
An automated loading cycle begins with an authorised task, route and destination. The LHD travels to the drawpoint using mapped navigation, enters the loading area under defined access conditions and fills its bucket either autonomously or with operator assistance. It then confirms payload or bucket state, trams to an orepass, truck or stockpile, dumps and repeats. Fleet control regulates intersections, queues and task priorities, while onboard protection limits speed and responds to obstacles. Battery-electric machines may insert opportunity charging into the schedule. Exceptions such as oversized rock, wheel slip, uncertain localisation, blocked routes or poor bucket fill are escalated to a controller. Reliable cycle performance therefore depends on fragmentation, drawpoint presentation, route upkeep, destination availability and fast recovery, not only on the autonomy software. ref
Mechanised charging systems can place explosives from a protected carrier and reduce the time people spend close to an unsupported development face. Digital blast plans guide hole identification and explosive loading, while wireless initiation removes some physical connections and allows controlled firing sequences. Current systems are generally mechanised or semi-automated rather than fully autonomous because explosives handling, hole condition and regulatory controls require close management. Integration with drilling data can improve conformance between planned and actual holes and support traceable execution. Before firing, the mine must still verify exclusion, personnel clearance, communications and authority through established blast procedures. Remote technology changes how exposure is controlled, but it does not replace explosives competence, reconciliation of loaded holes or independent confirmation that the blast area is secure. ref
Autonomous operations depend on sustained performance across machines, networks, software, maps, processes and people. Commissioning proves only an initial configuration; sensors drift, mine layouts change, software is updated and workforce capability evolves. Lifecycle support should therefore include remote and site assistance, preventive maintenance, spare-parts planning, competence development, performance reviews and controlled software deployment. Interoperability matters because underground mines rarely use one supplier for every vehicle or system. Position, task, status and alarm data must cross defined interfaces without creating conflicting authority. A technically successful pilot can still lose value if the mine cannot diagnose faults or adapt daily workflows. Long-term service levels and ownership of interfaces, data, configuration and recovery procedures should be agreed before scaling the autonomous fleet. ref
Underground automation requires a blend of mining knowledge, equipment operation, systems thinking and digital competence. Remote operators need to interpret camera views, maps, machine states and alarms while understanding the physical process they no longer feel directly. Maintainers need electrical, control, network and software diagnostic skills alongside mechanical expertise. Supervisors must coordinate mixed traffic, manage degraded modes and use performance data without overlooking field conditions. Engineers need competencies in risk assessment, integration, cybersecurity and change control. Training should combine classroom instruction, simulators, controlled field practice and assessed responses to abnormal situations. Experienced operators should help design interfaces and procedures because their task knowledge reveals exceptions that developers may miss. Automation changes roles and decision rights, so workforce consultation and career pathways are as important as technical instruction. ref
A useful business case tracks safety exposure, production and total system cost rather than quoting automation availability alone. Measures may include people-hours removed from hazardous zones, intervention frequency, tonnes moved, cycle time, payload consistency, drilling accuracy, machine utilisation, delay categories, energy use, tyre or component life and maintenance cost. The mine should also record network downtime, sensor faults, manual recoveries and time lost waiting for downstream processes. Baselines must come from comparable manual operations and account for ramp-up, geology, route length and fleet size. Benefits should be attributed carefully: higher utilisation is valuable only when it produces planned tonnes without transferring congestion or risk elsewhere. Post-implementation reviews should test whether assumptions remain valid and whether operational changes are sustaining the expected return. ref
Projects often stall because a successful machine trial does not prove operational readiness at scale. Common obstacles include unreliable networks, poor map governance, insufficient maintenance capability, unclear ownership, incompatible systems, underestimated exception handling and work practices designed around manual equipment. The pilot may also use vendor specialists and an isolated area that mask the support burden of normal production. Workforce concerns can grow if roles and training are addressed late. To progress, the mine needs a target operating model, realistic lifecycle costs, scalable support, defined integration architecture and evidence that risks remain controlled as more machines and people interact. Decision gates should evaluate human, organisational and technical maturity together. Automation is a continuing operational transformation, not a one-time equipment installation or software project. ref
Maintain visibility of all your staff members at all times during operations. Built according to strict industry guidelines and drawing on best practices, Crew Companion enables effective and reliable operations without needing any human interaction in day-to-day situations, as well as emergencies.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
The principal benefit is reduced human exposure to high-risk locations and tasks. Remote or autonomous equipment can work near unsupported ground, at recently blasted faces, in hot or dusty headings, around moving machinery and in areas where travel itself creates risk. Automation can also deliver consistent speed, route and process control, while sensors and event data improve situational awareness. These benefits are not automatic: removing an operator from the cab may introduce interaction, communications, software or supervisory hazards elsewhere. Safety improvement should therefore be demonstrated through a system-level assessment that compares the new operation with the previous one. Mines should measure actual exposure reduction, interventions and incidents and involve workers, suppliers and researchers in identifying emerging risks as technology and operating practices evolve. ref
Automation can introduce hazards from incorrect perception, localisation error, stale maps, software faults, network loss, cybersecurity compromise, unintended mode changes and unexpected interaction with people or conventional equipment. Remote operators may lose direct sensory cues, become overloaded by alarms or misunderstand which station has control. Maintainers may enter an area believing a machine is disabled when stored energy or remote commands remain available. Highly reliable systems can also encourage complacency or skill degradation, making rare failures harder to manage. Because these hazards span equipment, infrastructure and organisation, a component-by-component analysis is insufficient. System safety examines credible scenarios across the full lifecycle, including commissioning, normal production, degraded operation, maintenance, recovery, software updates and decommissioning, and assigns verifiable controls and responsibilities for each. ref
Collision prevention should start with eliminating unnecessary interaction and physically or administratively separating people from autonomous operating zones. Controlled access, route design, one-way traffic, intersection rules, speed limits and verified braking establish the primary protection. Positioning and proximity technologies add awareness of workers and vehicles, while onboard perception detects objects that may not be registered in the location system. Warning and automatic intervention thresholds should reflect stopping distance, sensor uncertainty and tunnel geometry. The mine must validate performance in darkness, dust, water spray, curves and changing headings, not only under ideal conditions. Vehicle, personnel and zone data should be presented coherently to controllers. No single sensor should be treated as complete protection; complementary technologies, clear authority and regular functional testing create the necessary defence in depth. ref
A loss of control or communication must lead to a predetermined safe response, normally a controlled stop followed by prevention of unintended restart. The appropriate safe state depends on the machine, gradient, load and surrounding hazards; simply removing power may not safely hold a suspended implement or vehicle on a slope. Remote controls should use maintained-action or deadman functions, prominent emergency shutdown, secure pairing and protection against unintended activation or interference. The system should identify damaged controls, stale commands and conflicting transmitters. Recovery must require positive verification of the machine, area and control authority rather than automatic resumption when the signal returns. Regular inspection, environmental sealing, frequency management and functional testing are essential because water ingress, impact damage or incorrect pairing can create dangerous unexpected movement. ref
Geofencing defines digital boundaries around autonomous routes, production zones or temporary hazards and links them to permitted machine behaviour. A machine may slow, stop or reject a task when it approaches a prohibited boundary. Access control complements this by preventing or detecting unauthorised entry by people or conventional vehicles. Real-time personnel and vehicle location can show occupancy, support zone clearance and alert controllers to a conflict, while physical gates, signs and procedures provide visible reinforcement. Digital boundaries must match the surveyed and physical environment; an outdated map or misplaced reader can create false confidence. Mines should assign ownership for creating, approving, activating and removing zones and should test boundary behaviour after map, software or infrastructure changes. Emergency access and rescue procedures also need clearly controlled overrides. ref
Proximity detection estimates the relationship between a worker and a machine and warns, slows or inhibits movement when defined risk zones are breached. It is particularly valuable where a person may enter a blind area during maintenance, recovery or mixed operation. More capable systems distinguish which machine motions create risk, allowing safe functions to continue while preventing movement toward the person. Effectiveness depends on detection coverage, wearable use, calibration, electromagnetic conditions and a zone design that accounts for stopping distance and human behaviour. Nuisance alarms can encourage workarounds, whereas missed detections can be fatal, so performance and event data require ongoing review. Proximity detection is a supplementary engineering control and should not replace physical separation, isolation, communication or safe work procedures where those controls are practicable. ref
Emergency stopping should be accessible to the remote operator and, where risk assessment requires, to people near the machine. It must override normal commands, bring hazardous motion to an appropriate safe state and prevent restart until deliberately reset. Isolation is a separate function: maintenance or entry into a danger area requires control of electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, gravitational and mechanical energy as well as remote command sources. Recovery procedures should define who takes control, how machine identity and mode are confirmed, how the area is checked and when manual operation is permitted. Controls must minimise accidental activation and prevent two stations from commanding the same machine. Design documentation, labels, inspections and proof tests should remain aligned with the actual configuration, including retrofits and software changes. ref
ISO 17757 is a central international reference for autonomous and semi-autonomous earth-moving and mining machine systems. It addresses safety criteria for the machine and the associated hardware, software and infrastructure, and it considers safe use within a defined functional environment across the system lifecycle. This system scope is important because underground autonomy depends on more than onboard controls: maps, communications, operating zones, supervisory systems and human interactions affect risk. The standard does not replace national mining law, site risk assessment or machine-specific requirements. Operators should identify applicable legislation and standards, define the intended operating domain and use competent functional-safety and mining expertise. Compliance evidence should include requirements traceability, hazard analysis, verification, validation, configuration control and management of changes after commissioning. ref
Autonomous machines are operational technology: digital systems directly control physical movement, braking, implements and access. A compromised account, malicious command, altered map, vulnerable remote connection or ransomware event can therefore affect both production and safety. Mines should inventory connected assets, segment operational networks, restrict privileges, authenticate remote access, monitor abnormal activity and control software and configuration changes. Security measures must respect real-time performance and safety availability; an ordinary information-technology response such as abruptly disconnecting a controller may create a physical hazard. Suppliers and operators should coordinate vulnerability handling, patch testing, backup and recovery throughout the equipment lifecycle. Incident exercises should include safe shutdown and manual operating alternatives. Cybersecurity belongs inside the safety and change-management process rather than being treated only as a corporate information-technology responsibility. ref
Personnel location provides an independent operational picture of who is inside autonomous zones, blast areas, travelways and refuge locations. Before an automated task begins, zone-based accountability can confirm clearance and identify a worker whose presence conflicts with the planned operation. During an incident, controllers can prioritise communications, search and evacuation using last-known or current locations rather than relying only on manual headcounts. The system’s accuracy, update rate and coverage must match the decision it supports; zone presence may be sufficient for blast clearance, while close machine interaction needs more precise protection. Tags, readers, software and procedures require testing, and missing or uncertain data must be visible. Location information supports decisions but does not replace physical search, communications or formally authorised clearance where regulation and site procedures require them. ref
Remote and autonomous operation can reduce the time workers spend near diesel exhaust, dust, heat, noise and whole-body vibration. Battery-electric equipment can further lower underground diesel particulate, gaseous emissions and heat at the source, potentially reducing ventilation load. The actual benefit depends on fleet replacement, duty cycle, ventilation strategy and whether workers remain nearby for support or recovery. New exposures must also be assessed, including battery fire products, electrical energy, screen-based work and sedentary control-room tasks. Diesel equipment that remains in the fleet still requires effective engine, fuel, after-treatment, maintenance and ventilation controls. Exposure monitoring should verify improvement rather than assuming it from equipment type. Automation is therefore one element of an integrated occupational-health program and not a substitute for controlling contaminants throughout the mine. ref
Remote operators can suffer reduced situational awareness because cameras and displays provide a narrower, mediated view than the cab. Latency, poor camera placement, alarm overload and limited motion or sound cues can make speed, distance and machine loading harder to judge. Supervising highly reliable automation may create long periods of low activity followed by urgent intervention, increasing vigilance demands and out-of-the-loop performance problems. One operator managing several machines can also face competing alarms and unclear priorities. Human-centred design should involve operators in interface development, test workload and abnormal scenarios, provide unambiguous mode and control indications, and design sensible staffing and breaks. Training must include degraded operation and recovery, not only routine production. Organisational pressure should never encourage operators to bypass alarms or safeguards to maintain output. ref
Validation should demonstrate that the complete detection function performs within specified limits for relevant people, vehicles and objects across the intended operating domain. Tests should cover distance, direction, approach speed, machine articulation and blind areas, together with underground conditions such as darkness, dust, spray, mud, reflective surfaces, gradients and electromagnetic interference. The mine should evaluate detection probability, false alarms, warning timing, automatic intervention and the resulting stopping margin. Sensor contamination, misalignment and component failure must produce detectable faults or safe responses. Testing should be repeated after installation, repair, calibration, software change or material alteration to the machine or mine layout. Standards provide methods and performance principles, but the site must translate them into scenarios derived from its own traffic, geometry, speeds and foreseeable misuse. ref
An effective investigation needs synchronised records from the machine, autonomy controller, fleet platform, communications network, positioning system and access-control environment. Useful data include commands, control mode, software and map versions, sensor health, alarms, speed, braking, route authority, operator actions, video, network quality and the locations of people and vehicles. Investigators also need maintenance history, recent changes, training records and physical evidence. Time synchronisation is critical because independent logs otherwise create misleading sequences. Data retention should cover near misses and safety interventions, not only accidents, while respecting privacy and access controls. The mine should preserve evidence before systems overwrite it and involve operational, engineering, human-factors and supplier expertise. Findings should address underlying system and organisational conditions rather than stopping at operator error or component failure. ref
Autonomous aerial, tracked or legged robots can enter unstable, smoke-filled, flooded or otherwise uncertain workings before exposing rescue personnel. Equipped with LiDAR, cameras, thermal imaging, gas sensors and communications relays, they can map access routes, identify obstacles, assess ground conditions and search for signs of people. Teams of robots may share mapping data and cover complex networks more quickly than a single platform. Their information can improve rescue planning, but limitations remain: communications may fail, endurance is finite, sensors can be obscured and a disabled robot may obstruct a route. Mines should pre-plan interfaces with emergency command, maintain deployable equipment, practise missions and define how robotic data will be verified. Robots support informed human decisions; they do not replace trained mine-rescue teams or statutory emergency arrangements. ref
Where difficult conditions exist and your nearest exit is kilometres away, Crew Companion is the answer for the safety of your staff: a scalable and customisable personnel monitoring solution specifically designed to meet your organisation’s safety needs in the mining industry. Ensure your underground and open-pit operations are visible and therefore manageable – all in line with the most advanced HSE and business requirements.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
Mining Industry:
Underground Mining | Surface and Open-Pit Mining | Hard-Rock Mining | Coal Mining | Metal and Non-Metal Mining | The Mining Lifecycle | Mining Companies and Stakeholders | Mining Jobs and Roles | Digital Mining and Mine Automation | Sustainable and Responsible Mining
Production Process:
Mineral Exploration and Resource Definition | Mine Planning and Design | Underground Mine Development | Drilling and Blasting | Underground Mining Methods | Loading, Hauling and Transportation | Material Handling and Conveying | Crushing, Grinding and Mineral Processing | Waste Rock and Tailings Management | Mine Closure and Rehabilitation
Safety:
Mine Safety Management | Workforce Accountability | Underground Access and Qualification Control | Emergency Preparedness and Response | Mine Evacuation and Mustering | Mine Rescue Operations | Blast Clearance and Re-Entry | Vehicle Collision Avoidance | Ventilation and Gas Monitoring | Ground Control and Rock-Fall Prevention
Geographical Areas and Regions:
Mining in Australia | Mining in Canada | Mining in Sweden and the Nordic Region | Mining in Chile | Mining in Peru and the Andes | Mining in Southern Africa | Mining in the United States | Mining in Central and Western Europe | Mining in West Africa | Mining in Arctic and High-Altitude Regions
Mining Equipment and Technology:
Drilling Rigs and Mining Jumbos | Load–Haul–Dump Machines | Underground and Surface Haul Trucks | Continuous Miners and Roadheaders | Crushers, Conveyors and Hoisting Systems | Mine Ventilation and Dewatering Equipment | Personal Protective and Self-Rescue Equipment | Underground Communication Networks | Personnel Positioning and Proximity Detection | Autonomous and Remote-Controlled Mining Equipment | Underground Network