Digital mining uses connected sensors, software, communications and automation to turn operational data into decisions across planning and production. In practice, this can mean monitoring equipment condition, locating people and machines, updating a production plan as conditions change, or operating equipment from a protected control room. A digital mine is not defined by a single platform or by replacing every worker with a machine. It is an operating model in which reliable data is collected, interpreted and acted on by people and control systems. The best programs begin with a specific operational constraint, establish a measurable baseline, and connect technology to work processes, maintenance, training and accountability. ref
Mechanisation replaces manual effort with powered equipment, while automation lets equipment perform defined tasks with limited direct control. Remote control moves the operator away from the machine but still requires continuous human input. Higher levels of automation may handle navigation, drilling cycles, haulage routes or process control within approved operating limits, while people supervise exceptions and intervene when required. These categories can coexist in one mine: a loader may be remotely operated in one heading and run an automated cycle in another. Clear terminology matters because each mode has different staffing, communications, exclusion-zone and safety requirements. Mines should document the operating mode, control authority, fallback state and handover process for every automated task. ref
Tasks with repetitive cycles, measurable boundaries and high exposure to hazards are often suitable candidates. Examples include longwall face alignment, drilling to a defined pattern, loading and hauling along mapped routes, ore handling, ventilation control and inspection in inaccessible areas. A candidate process should have stable enough conditions for sensors and control logic to work, plus a safe response when data or communications fail. Mines should compare the expected reduction in exposure, variability, delays or cost with integration and maintenance demands. Automation can be introduced incrementally, starting with decision support or remote operation before closed-loop control. The process owner, operators and maintainers should help define success criteria before procurement. ref
Automation can improve productivity by making cycles more consistent, reducing setup and repositioning delays, and allowing equipment to work during periods when people must leave an area. Digital dispatch can match equipment and jobs to current priorities, while condition monitoring can identify developing faults before they stop production. These gains depend on the whole system: reliable machine availability, usable communications, accurate plans, trained operators and coordinated workflows. A faster machine does not necessarily increase mine output if downstream haulage, ventilation, charging or maintenance becomes the bottleneck. Mines should measure tonnes or metres per operating hour alongside availability, delays, rework and safety performance. Pilot results should be compared with a documented baseline and include operating costs. ref
Digital mining can support better asset use, maintenance planning, energy management, inventory control and environmental reporting as well as production. Shared operational data helps teams see where delays accumulate and whether a change in equipment, sequence or ventilation is producing the intended effect. Remote operation can reduce travel and exposure in hazardous areas, while condition data can help prioritise scarce maintenance resources. The business case should distinguish direct benefits, such as avoided downtime, from enabling benefits, such as improved traceability or faster decisions. It should also include lifecycle costs for sensors, network infrastructure, cybersecurity, integration and support. Results vary with geology, mine layout and work practices, so avoid assuming published benefits transfer unchanged to another site. ref
A mine digital twin is a digital representation of selected physical assets, processes or spaces that is updated with operational data. It may combine mine geometry, equipment state, production plans, survey information and sensor readings to help teams compare the expected state with current conditions. Operations can use this view to assess a plan, examine a bottleneck or understand how a change may affect connected processes. A twin is only as useful as its data quality, update frequency and defined purpose; a static 3D model alone is not a live operational twin. The model should identify data ownership, uncertainty and the authoritative source for each layer. Start with a bounded use case, then expand when the data and workflow prove dependable. ref
A real-time platform brings information from machines, sensors, dispatch, plans and people into a consistent operational view. Its purpose is to make important events visible soon enough for a responsible team to act, rather than to collect data without a decision pathway. Common uses include tracking equipment state, monitoring production against plan, recording location events and identifying emerging process deviations. Integration requires agreed identifiers, timestamps, units, data quality rules and ownership. A platform should show where information came from and flag stale or missing feeds; otherwise, users may trust an apparently precise display that no longer reflects the mine. Good implementation also defines roles, escalation thresholds and operating procedures for acting on alerts. ref
Digital shift planning connects the mine plan with actual progress, equipment condition, access constraints and work completed by the previous crew. Supervisors can use a shared status view to identify unfinished tasks, hazards, blocked routes and equipment awaiting service before allocating the next shift. Automated records reduce reliance on handwritten notes, but they do not remove the need for a clear handover conversation, especially when conditions are uncertain. Plans should distinguish confirmed facts from estimates and allow workers to report changes that sensors may not capture. When job status and location data are timely, dispatch can reduce conflicting assignments and unnecessary travel. Measure improvements through handover completeness, schedule adherence, rework and lost time, not software logins alone. ref
Remote operation shifts some machine control from the face or vehicle cab to a station in a safer or more comfortable location, often on surface. This can reduce exposure to vibration, dust, heat and ground hazards while allowing an operator to oversee more than one machine in suitable conditions. It also creates new demands: dependable video and control links, ergonomic workstations, clear alarm priorities, operator workload management and well-practised recovery procedures. The mine must define who has control, how authority transfers between local and remote operators, and what happens during a network interruption. Remote work does not eliminate underground presence, because inspection, services, maintenance and recovery may still require people. Workforce consultation and training help maintain trust and effective response. ref
Robots and drones can inspect, map or sample places that are difficult, slow or hazardous for people to enter. Underground systems may use lidar, cameras, inertial sensors and simultaneous localisation and mapping to build point clouds without satellite positioning. The resulting data supports survey updates, geotechnical assessment, volume calculations and inspection records. Some platforms can autonomously follow a route or return to a known point, but performance depends on dust, water, reflective surfaces, geometry and communications. A robot is most valuable when its data enters an established workflow and a qualified person knows how to interpret it. Operators should define flight or travel limits, recovery plans, data quality checks and safe interaction rules with vehicles and workers. ref
Longwall automation uses sensors and control systems to guide equipment such as shearers and roof supports along the face, helping keep operations aligned with the seam and planned geometry. Remote or automated control can reduce the need for workers to stand close to moving machinery and roof hazards, while consistent positioning can limit interruptions for manual correction. The system still depends on accurate sensing, suitable calibration, reliable communications and workers who understand its operating limits. Geological changes, sensor faults or unexpected face conditions may require human assessment and a controlled fallback. Performance should be evaluated through production continuity, alignment quality, exposure reduction and maintenance demands. Automation is most effective when integrated with ground control, ventilation, maintenance and shift procedures. ref
Combining worker and equipment locations can give dispatchers and supervisors a more complete picture of underground activity. It can help identify traffic conflicts, confirm access to a work area, support blast clearance and show where people may need assistance. Location data can also help compare planned and actual travel or understand how equipment is being used. The level of precision should match the decision: a zone-level detection may be adequate for headcounts, whereas collision prevention may require more immediate proximity information and vehicle-specific safeguards. Location systems need surveyed maps, maintained readers or anchors, tag assignment controls and procedures for outages. They should supplement communication and risk controls, not create a false assumption that every person is continuously visible. ref
Automated and digitally coordinated mine processes rely on communication between equipment, control systems, workers and surface operations. Underground connectivity carries control commands, telemetry, voice, video, tracking and maintenance data, but no single network design suits every mine. Leaky-feeder radio, wired backbone, Wi-Fi, private cellular, mesh networks and point-to-point links may each serve particular applications. Tunnel geometry, moving headings, electrical noise, dust, water and blasting damage complicate coverage and maintenance. Mines should map critical use cases and required latency, availability and resilience before selecting technology. Redundant paths and local safe states are important where loss of communication could create a hazard. Coverage must be tested in operating conditions and maintained as workings advance. ref
Predictive maintenance uses condition measurements and operating history to estimate when an asset may need attention, allowing work to be scheduled before a failure interrupts production. Sensors can monitor variables such as temperature, vibration, pressure, electrical current or lubricant condition. Analytics can flag patterns for review, but a warning is not a diagnosis: technicians need context, inspection and validated thresholds before changing maintenance plans. Useful programs connect alerts to work orders, spare parts, maintenance windows and feedback on confirmed defects. They also account for sensor calibration, data gaps and false alarms. Start with critical assets that have measurable failure modes and adequate maintenance records. Track avoided unplanned downtime, maintenance cost, repeat failures and alert precision to assess value. ref
Digital systems can help mines measure energy use, ventilation demand, water balance, emissions and material movement at a finer operational level. Those measurements can reveal avoidable idling, inefficient pumping, excess ventilation or deviations from environmental limits. Automation may coordinate ventilation-on-demand with equipment and personnel activity, but safe minimum ventilation and emergency requirements must remain protected. Environmental dashboards depend on sensor calibration, representative sampling and clear reporting boundaries. Data should be reviewed with environmental and engineering specialists rather than treated as a substitute for formal monitoring or permits. A sound business case links a measurable baseline to a specific intervention, such as reducing idle time or optimising fan schedules, then checks whether savings persist without compromising health, safety or production. ref
You as the operator of a large mine know best how difficult and stressful it can be to precisely locate your entire workforce in time with the blast schedule. Harsh environments like mines are places where safety matters most. Blocked tunnels, disrupted communication lines and blackouts will make an evacuation a chaotic nightmare even for a well-trained team. Locating employees in a timely manner is crucial.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
Underground mines use combinations of wired fibre or copper backbones, leaky-feeder radio, Wi-Fi access points, mesh nodes, private cellular systems and local machine links. A leaky feeder radiates radio signals along a coaxial cable, while node-based systems route data through connected access points. Voice, tracking, telemetry and machine control may share infrastructure or use separate networks, depending on reliability and safety requirements. Network design must account for long and changing tunnels, blind corners, electrical interference, equipment movement and damage from blasting. Mines should select architecture against the application’s coverage, bandwidth, latency, availability and survivability needs. Survey, testing, power backup and maintenance plans are as important as the chosen radio technology. ref
A node-based network places radio or data nodes through mine workings and links them by wired or wireless connections to a surface gateway. A miner’s radio or device communicates with a nearby node, and the network routes the message toward the intended destination. Nodes can extend coverage as development advances, and some systems can carry voice, tracking and operational data. Each extra hop may affect capacity, latency and resilience, so network planning needs to consider traffic load and alternate routes. Power loss, physical damage or interference can isolate a section unless the design includes suitable redundancy. The mine should maintain accurate node locations, test emergency coverage and define what applications continue locally when the surface connection is lost. ref
Leaky-feeder systems use coaxial cable with controlled openings that allow radio signals to couple along the cable route. Underground users can communicate with radios near the cable, and repeaters or amplifiers extend coverage. The system is widely used for voice and can support some data services, but it is not a universal broadband solution. Coverage depends on cable placement, connectors, power and damage; branches into new workings require design and maintenance. A damaged cable may affect communication beyond the visible break. Mines should identify critical coverage gaps and provide alternate communications for emergency plans. Leaky feeder can coexist with Wi-Fi, tracking and data networks, with each system selected for its required function and service level. ref
Electronic tracking associates a person with a tag or radio and uses readers, network nodes or location algorithms to estimate where that person is. Some systems record passage through fixed checkpoints; others infer a current zone from the nearest receiver or calculate a more continuous position. The result is an operational estimate, not necessarily survey-grade coordinates. Accuracy varies with mine geometry, reader spacing, signal conditions, tag use and system design. Reliable deployment requires correct tag-to-person assignments, battery management, map updates, coverage testing and clear procedures for missing or stale data. Tracking can support headcounts, work coordination and emergency response, but it cannot replace check-in rules, voice communication or trained incident command. ref
A mine operations centre brings together people, plans and digital systems used to monitor and coordinate work. Operators may view equipment status, production, alarms, worker locations and communications on mine maps or control screens. The centre can support dispatch, remote operation and emergency coordination, but it does not make decisions safe by itself. Displays must prioritise actionable information, show uncertainty and avoid alarm overload. Roles should specify who acknowledges alarms, who can issue commands and how control passes to underground personnel. The centre also needs resilient power and communications, tested backup arrangements and practiced incident procedures. Its effectiveness depends on skilled staff, clear protocols and regular review of how decisions are made. ref
Radio-frequency identification uses tags and readers to identify people or assets without requiring direct visual line of sight. In mines, fixed readers may register a tag at an access point or work zone; active tags can transmit more frequently and support broader visibility when paired with a suitable infrastructure. RFID may assist with personnel accountability, equipment inventory, access control and tracking selected supplies. The method and achievable location resolution depend on tag type, reader placement, metal structures, power and mine geometry. RFID records should be interpreted with their detection limitations in mind: a missed read does not prove a person is absent. Mines need assignment controls, maintenance routines and a safe process for lost or damaged tags. ref
Digitalisation requires networks that match the demands of each application, from low-bandwidth sensor reports to voice, video and machine-control traffic. A mine should define which services are safety critical, which can tolerate delays and how the system behaves if a link disappears. Coverage changes as headings advance, so infrastructure must be relocatable, maintainable and tested under actual operating conditions. Fibre can provide high-capacity backbone connections, while wireless access supports mobile equipment and personnel. Gateways may connect legacy equipment to newer platforms, but interfaces need cybersecurity controls and clear ownership. Network monitoring should reveal outages, latency and weak coverage before they undermine automation. A well-designed network is an operational utility with planned maintenance and resilience. ref
Underground vehicles combine sensors, control software and a map or local reference to estimate their position and move safely. Depending on the machine, navigation may use lidar, cameras, inertial measurement units, wheel odometry, reflectors, magnetic markers or radio-based positioning. Unlike surface trucks, underground vehicles cannot normally depend on satellite GPS. Remote-controlled machines rely on an operator’s view and command link; autonomous machines use onboard logic to execute defined tasks while monitoring obstacles and operating limits. Dust, water, changing headings and sensor occlusion can degrade perception. Systems therefore need speed limits, geofenced routes, obstacle responses, safe stops and a way to recover from localization failure. Site-specific validation is essential before routine production use. ref
Underground automation may use cameras, lidar, radar, ultrasonic sensors, inertial units, encoders, proximity tags, gas detectors, pressure and temperature sensors, and machine-state signals. No sensor provides a complete picture under all mine conditions. Cameras can be impaired by dust or low light; lidar needs clear returns; radar may detect objects without identifying them; inertial estimates drift over time. Sensor fusion combines different observations, while software checks whether readings are plausible and current. Sensor selection should follow a hazard and task analysis, considering range, accuracy, failure mode, maintenance and certification requirements. Mines must also protect sensors from vibration, water, contamination and impact, then periodically verify calibration and performance in representative workings. ref
Mine maps begin with survey control and are updated as development, stoping and infrastructure changes alter the workings. Laser scanning, photogrammetry and mobile mapping can capture tunnel geometry, while survey instruments tie that data to mine coordinates. A digital map may then support navigation, ventilation modelling, geotechnical assessment, asset location and emergency planning. Its usefulness depends on current geometry, consistent coordinate systems, metadata and version control. Automated systems should not rely on an outdated route or map layer without checking it against current conditions. Mines need a defined map owner, update frequency, validation process and method for flagging uncertain or inaccessible areas. New scans should be compared with prior records to detect changes and preserve traceability. ref
An underground digital twin links a digital model to data about the physical mine, such as equipment status, production, location or geotechnical conditions. It can help teams visualise current activity, compare measurements with a plan and explore operational scenarios. A twin might represent one mobile fleet, a ventilation circuit or a broader mine environment; scope should be defined around a decision need. Data feeds need timestamps, quality indicators and clear ownership so users know whether the model reflects current conditions. A 3D model without live or frequently refreshed data is better described as a digital model. Digital twins assist judgement and planning, but their predictions remain dependent on assumptions and should be checked against field evidence. ref
Video analytics applies software to camera feeds to detect or classify events such as a person entering a restricted area, a vehicle approaching a crossing or required personal protective equipment being absent. In underground settings, performance can be affected by lighting, dust, water droplets, camera vibration, occlusion and changing backgrounds. Video alone may not identify who is present or where an event fits into the work sequence. Combining camera events with location, machine state or dispatch data can improve context, provided privacy, access and retention rules are defined. Analytics should be validated in the actual mine and treated as a decision aid. A human should review consequential alerts, and failures or blind spots must be included in risk controls. ref
Longwall alignment systems estimate the position and orientation of shearers, supports and the face relative to a target profile, then guide equipment to maintain the planned geometry. Sensors and control algorithms can reduce manual surveying and correction stops. Remote guidance may use laser-based or other positional references suited to the machinery and mine. The system must account for changing geology, sensor drift, mechanical wear and communications interruptions. Operators need to understand how the target is set, how deviations are displayed and which conditions require manual intervention. Alignment records help engineers assess performance and update plans. Because longwall equipment is large and interconnected, commissioning should test the full system and safe stopping behavior, rather than individual components in isolation. ref
Autonomous or remotely supervised mapping robots can carry lidar and imaging sensors into stopes, ore passes and abandoned workings where entry may expose people to falls, poor ground or unsupported voids. Simultaneous localisation and mapping allows the platform to estimate its motion while building a point cloud of the surrounding space. The data can support volume calculations, geological interpretation, inspection and planning. Before deployment, operators should assess communication loss, recovery, battery life, dust and collision risks, and ensure the robot is suitable for the environment. Point clouds need registration and quality review before they inform decisions. The technology can reduce exposure, but it does not remove the need for geotechnical interpretation or controlled access around the survey area. ref
Mine automation connects operational technology that can affect machinery, ventilation and production, so cybersecurity must protect availability and safe control as well as confidentiality. Useful controls include separating business and control networks, restricting remote access, using unique accounts, maintaining an asset inventory, reviewing vendor connections, backing up configurations and monitoring for unusual activity. Updates should be planned and tested against operational requirements; immediate patching may not be practical on certified or safety-critical equipment. Incident response should cover loss of communications, compromised credentials and unsafe commands, with clear manual or local fallback procedures. Suppliers and mine teams need shared responsibility for vulnerabilities and support lifecycles. Cybersecurity should be integrated into system design, commissioning, maintenance and change management. ref
Maintain visibility of all your staff members at all times during operations. Built according to strict industry guidelines and drawing on best practices, Crew Companion enables effective and reliable operations without needing any human interaction in day-to-day situations, as well as emergencies.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
Automation can move people away from high-risk tasks by allowing equipment to be operated remotely, guided automatically or inspected robotically. Examples include longwall alignment, remote operation of loaders, tele-remote drilling and robotic mapping of open stopes. Reducing routine presence near moving machinery, unsupported ground, dust or heat can lower exposure, but new tasks may introduce different risks such as control-room fatigue, loss of situational awareness or difficult recovery. Mines should assess the full work system, including people who maintain, supervise and recover automated equipment. Exclusion zones, local procedures and safe states remain necessary. Exposure reduction should be measured alongside incident precursors, workload, maintenance demands and the frequency with which workers must re-enter hazardous areas. ref
Digital tracking can give an emergency control team a recent indication of where tagged workers were detected and which zones may contain people. This can help prioritise checks, estimate headcounts and direct responders, especially where routes are long or visibility is poor. The information is only as reliable as system coverage, tag assignment, power and the time of the last detection. During an incident, command staff should distinguish confirmed locations from stale or uncertain estimates and verify them through radio contact, muster checks or rescue teams. Tracking displays should be available from a protected control point with tested backup power. Drills should exercise system failure as well as normal operation, and records should be reviewed after changes to mine layout or communications infrastructure. ref
Proximity detection systems identify when a person or object is within a defined zone around a machine and provide a warning or, in some designs, inhibit selected machine movements. Underground systems may use magnetic fields, radio-frequency signals, tags, radar or combinations of sensors. The protected zone should reflect machine geometry, stopping distance, speed, task and visibility, rather than relying on a single nominal radius. Systems need to be tested for interference, blind spots, tag orientation and realistic work scenarios. Workers must know what alarms mean and what action to take. Proximity detection is one layer in a broader traffic and machine safety program that includes procedures, visibility, communications, maintenance and separation of people from moving equipment. ref
Collision risk management starts with mapping routes, intersections, pedestrian areas and tasks where people and vehicles can meet. Mines can reduce conflict through physical separation, one-way traffic, speed limits, right-of-way rules, warning devices, proximity sensing and clear control of access to automated zones. Automated vehicles need to detect obstacles, stop within safe distances and communicate their status to nearby workers. Workers need training on vehicle behavior, blind spots, signals and recovery procedures. A detection system can fail or be obstructed, so it should not be the only safeguard. Investigations of near misses should examine layout, schedules, visibility, control logic and human factors rather than attributing events solely to operator error. Review controls whenever routes or fleet modes change. ref
Programmable electronic systems can perform control and protective functions that were once implemented with hardwired circuits. Software complexity, sensors, communication links and configuration changes create failure modes that may be difficult to see during routine inspection. Functional safety applies systematic analysis to identify hazards, define safety functions and verify that the system achieves the required risk reduction. The process should cover design, software, hardware, commissioning, operation, maintenance and changes, with documented evidence and independent review where appropriate. A device’s electrical approval does not by itself establish that its control logic is safe for a particular machine or task. Mines and suppliers should agree on responsibilities, testing criteria and records across the equipment lifecycle. ref
Safe introduction begins with a site-specific hazard assessment covering routes, people, machines, intersections, operating modes and foreseeable faults. The mine should define the autonomous operating area, access controls, vehicle behavior, emergency stop and recovery arrangements, communications requirements and interface with conventional equipment. Commissioning should verify the system against documented acceptance criteria in representative conditions. Workers, contractors and emergency responders need training before operations begin, and changes to routes, software or equipment should trigger review. Monitoring should identify unexpected stops, boundary violations, loss of localization and human interventions. Australian guidance emphasises desired safety outcomes and competent hazard management for mobile autonomous systems; local law and regulator guidance must be checked for each jurisdiction. ref
Emergency communications and tracking should help underground workers contact surface personnel and help responders determine where people may be. The system must be designed for the mine’s hazards, layout and emergency plan, with coverage that remains useful after foreseeable damage or power loss. Voice communication, text or signaling, location data and personnel accountability solve related but distinct problems; one cannot be assumed to replace another. The mine should test equipment, backup power, coverage and control-room procedures, and train workers to use the system under stress. Records must show when a location was last updated and whether communication paths are working. Emergency plans should define how dispatchers verify information and use manual headcounts when digital systems are unavailable. ref
Real-time personnel visibility can support blast clearance by showing whether assigned workers have left a defined exclusion zone and by directing attention to unresolved locations. It can reduce dependence on repeated manual calls, but it cannot certify that an area is clear unless detection coverage, identity assignment and clearance rules are reliable. Mines should combine digital location information with established blast procedures, positive communication and responsible-person verification. Any unknown, stale or contradictory record should be resolved before firing. After a blast, access should follow the mine’s re-entry criteria, atmospheric checks and ground inspection; tracking does not establish that conditions are safe. A documented audit trail can help improve scheduling and investigate delays, while preserving a clear human authority for clearance decisions. ref
Control-room staff should treat personnel location as time-stamped decision support, not as an unquestionable live truth. During an incident they can use the display to identify last known detections, likely occupied zones and possible routes, then coordinate radio checks, muster points and rescue teams. The interface should make stale signals, missing tags and coverage gaps visible. Procedures should define who interprets the map, who communicates with incident command and how uncertainty is recorded. Systems need backup power and accessible mine maps, and staff should practice both routine and degraded modes. After an event or exercise, compare displayed detections with confirmed outcomes to identify gaps. This supports faster response without encouraging rescuers to enter an area based on incomplete digital information. ref
Automation can reduce physical exposure while introducing workload, monitoring and coordination risks. Operators may become responsible for supervising multiple machines, responding to rare alarms or diagnosing faults with limited sensory cues. Long periods of monitoring can reduce vigilance, while unclear control handovers can create conflicting commands. Workers underground may also be uncertain about the behavior of an autonomous vehicle or the meaning of its signals. Risk management should include interface design, workload limits, staffing, communication protocols, training and opportunities for workers to report problems. Procedures need to maintain skills for manual intervention and recovery. Mine management should involve operators and maintainers when designing workflows and should assess psychosocial effects, role changes and fatigue as part of the automation safety case. ref
Robots and workers need clearly defined operating zones, movement rules and communication methods. A robot should have speed and force limits appropriate to the task, obstacle detection, emergency stopping and a predictable response to loss of localization or communications. Workers need to know when the robot is active, whether it can move autonomously and how to approach it safely. Before mapping or inspection, the team should assess ground conditions, ventilation, explosive atmospheres, radio coverage and recovery options. Robots should be isolated before maintenance, and batteries or electrical components must be suitable for the environment. Test scenarios should include dust, occlusion, obstacles and network loss. Human supervision remains important when sensor data is incomplete or the environment changes unexpectedly. ref
Digital mapping, scanning, geotechnical monitoring and event data can help engineers detect changes in ground conditions and communicate controls to crews. Instruments may measure convergence, stress, seismic activity, support performance or movement at selected locations. Three-dimensional scans can document exposed surfaces without requiring close access, and comparisons over time can reveal new features or deformation. These tools do not replace competent ground assessment, support design or workplace inspections. Sensor locations and thresholds must be selected for the geotechnical setting, and data needs to be interpreted by qualified personnel. Mines should define alert responsibilities, evacuation or exclusion responses, and verification procedures. A digital record can strengthen trend analysis and handovers when linked to accurate maps and current support information. ref
Every critical digital system needs a planned degraded mode that keeps the mine in a known safe condition. For a vehicle, that may mean stopping, restricting movement or transferring control to an authorised local operator. For tracking, it may mean switching to radio check-ins, manual headcounts or another approved accountability method. Procedures should state who declares the failure, which operations pause, how the system is isolated and what checks are required before restart. Workers need a simple way to report outages, and control rooms should see loss of data rather than silently displaying old values. Recovery must include testing, map or configuration checks and communication to affected crews. Drills should include realistic power, network, sensor and software failures. ref
Validation checks that an automated system performs its intended safety functions in the actual mine environment and under foreseeable abnormal conditions. It should cover sensors, control logic, machine interfaces, communication loss, emergency stops, access control and interaction with people and other equipment. Testing should use documented scenarios and acceptance criteria, with records of defects, corrective actions and approval. A lab test or supplier demonstration cannot capture every mine-specific condition, such as changing geometry, dust, vibration or mixed fleets. Ongoing validation is also needed after software updates, equipment changes, route modifications or significant incidents. Independent functional safety assessment may be appropriate for critical systems. Mines should preserve evidence through commissioning and maintenance so future teams understand assumptions and limitations. ref
Automation can reduce the number of people routinely working near the face, but it does not remove the need to account for every worker and contractor during an emergency. Digital personnel tracking can show recent detections and support zone headcounts, while vehicle status and network telemetry may help responders understand access or equipment conditions. Rescue plans should define how this information is verified, who has authority to act and what manual methods are used if systems fail. Automated machines may need to move to a safe state or be isolated before responders enter. Muster points and communications must remain understandable to all crews. Training and exercises should include mixed human and automated operations, missing-person scenarios, loss of power and uncertainty in location data. ref
Where difficult conditions exist and your nearest exit is kilometres away, Crew Companion is the answer for the safety of your staff: a scalable and customisable personnel monitoring solution specifically designed to meet your organisation’s safety needs in the mining industry. Ensure your underground and open-pit operations are visible and therefore manageable – all in line with the most advanced HSE and business requirements.
Crew Companion by Identec Solutions
Mining Industry:
Underground Mining | Surface and Open-Pit Mining | Hard-Rock Mining | Coal Mining | Metal and Non-Metal Mining | The Mining Lifecycle | Mining Companies and Stakeholders | Mining Jobs and Roles | Digital Mining and Mine Automation | Sustainable and Responsible Mining
Production Process:
Mineral Exploration and Resource Definition | Mine Planning and Design | Underground Mine Development | Drilling and Blasting | Underground Mining Methods | Loading, Hauling and Transportation | Material Handling and Conveying | Crushing, Grinding and Mineral Processing | Waste Rock and Tailings Management | Mine Closure and Rehabilitation
Safety:
Mine Safety Management | Workforce Accountability | Underground Access and Qualification Control | Emergency Preparedness and Response | Mine Evacuation and Mustering | Mine Rescue Operations | Blast Clearance and Re-Entry | Vehicle Collision Avoidance | Ventilation and Gas Monitoring | Ground Control and Rock-Fall Prevention
Geographical Areas and Regions:
Mining in Australia | Mining in Canada | Mining in Sweden and the Nordic Region | Mining in Chile | Mining in Peru and the Andes | Mining in Southern Africa | Mining in the United States | Mining in Central and Western Europe | Mining in West Africa | Mining in Arctic and High-Altitude Regions
Mining Equipment and Technology:
Drilling Rigs and Mining Jumbos | Load–Haul–Dump Machines | Underground and Surface Haul Trucks | Continuous Miners and Roadheaders | Crushers, Conveyors and Hoisting Systems | Mine Ventilation and Dewatering Equipment | Personal Protective and Self-Rescue Equipment | Underground Communication Networks | Personnel Positioning and Proximity Detection | Autonomous and Remote-Controlled Mining Equipment | Underground Network